Literature DB >> 19864479

Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.

Elizabeth J Kvach1, David Ferguson, Paul F Riska, Marie L Landry.   

Abstract

The BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, a real-time PCR assay for the detection of the Clostridium difficile toxin B (tcdB) gene, was compared with the toxin A/B (Tox A/B) II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a two-step algorithm which includes a C. Diff Chek-60 glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen assay followed by cytotoxin neutralization. Four hundred liquid or semisolid stool samples submitted for diagnostic C. difficile testing, 200 GDH antigen positive and 200 GDH antigen negative, were selected for analysis. All samples were tested by the C. Diff Chek-60 GDH antigen and cytotoxin neutralization assays, the Tox A/B II ELISA, and the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay. Specimens with discrepant results were tested by toxigenic culture as an independent "gold standard." Of 200 GDH-positive samples, 71 were positive by the Tox A/B II ELISA, 88 were positive by the two-step method, 93 were positive by PCR, and 96 were positive by the GDH antigen assay only. Of 200 GDH-negative samples, 3 were positive by PCR only. Toxigenic culture was performed for 41 samples with discrepant results, and 39 were culture positive. Culture resolution of discrepant results showed the Tox A/B II assay to have detected 70 (66.7%), the two-step method to have detected 87 (82.9%), and PCR to have detected 96 (91.4%) of 105 true positives. The BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay was more sensitive in detecting toxigenic C. difficile than the Tox A/B II assay (P < 0.0001); however, the difference between PCR and the two-step method was not significant (P = 0.1237). Enhanced sensitivity and rapid turnaround time make the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay an important advance in the diagnosis of toxigenic C. difficile infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19864479      PMCID: PMC2812270          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01630-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  27 in total

1.  Rapid detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in diarrheal stools by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Frédéric Barbut; Mylena Braun; Béatrice Burghoffer; Valérie Lalande; Catherine Eckert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Planche; Adamma Aghaizu; Richard Holliman; Peter Riley; Jan Poloniecki; Aodhán Breathnach; Sanjeev Krishna
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Development and evaluation of a PCR method for detection of the Clostridium difficile toxin B gene in stool specimens.

Authors:  C Guilbault; A-C Labbé; L Poirier; L Busque; C Béliveau; M Laverdière
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Analysis of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile strains.

Authors:  S H Cohen; Y J Tang; J Silva
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium difficile and serum levels of IgG antibody against toxin A.

Authors:  L Kyne; M Warny; A Qamar; C P Kelly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Does my patient have Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Ari Robicsek
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile associated infection, diarrhea and colitis.

Authors:  Perry Hookman; Jamie S Barkin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Lynne M Sloan; Brian J Duresko; Daniel R Gustafson; Jon E Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Dena Lyras; Jennifer R O'Connor; Pauline M Howarth; Susan P Sambol; Glen P Carter; Tongted Phumoonna; Rachael Poon; Vicki Adams; Gayatri Vedantam; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding; Julian I Rood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  46 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile prevalence rates in a large healthcare system stratified according to patient population, age, gender, and specimen consistency.

Authors:  J H Boone; M Goodykoontz; S J Rhodes; K Price; J Smith; K N Gearhart; R J Carman; T M Kerkering; T D Wilkins; D M Lyerly
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Glutamate dehydrogenase for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Simon D Goldenberg; Penny R Cliff; Gary L French
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Authors:  Torbjörn Norén; Ingegärd Alriksson; Josefin Andersson; Thomas Akerlund; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Assessment of Clostridium difficile infections by quantitative detection of tcdB toxin by use of a real-time cell analysis system.

Authors:  Alex B Ryder; Ying Huang; Haijing Li; Min Zheng; Xiaobo Wang; Charles W Stratton; Xiao Xu; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Recent epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Teena Chopra; Pranatharthi Chandrasekar; Hossein Salimnia; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; George J Alangaden
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 7.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Ellen Jo Baron; Lance R Peterson; David H Persing
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Modifications of commercial toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR resulting in improved economy and workflow efficiency.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Dorothy Bilbo; Mary Paul; Maureen Napierala; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  A novel subtyping assay for detection of Clostridium difficile virulence genes.

Authors:  Stephanie L Angione; Aartik A Sarma; Aleksey Novikov; Leah Seward; Jennifer H Fieber; Leonard A Mermel; Anubhav Tripathi
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Similar outcomes of IBD inpatients with Clostridium difficile infection detected by ELISA or PCR assay.

Authors:  Yinghong Wang; Ashish Atreja; Xianrui Wu; Bret A Lashner; Aaron Brzezinski; Bo Shen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.