Literature DB >> 9454863

Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task.

D Y Henriques1, E M Klier, M A Smith, D Lowy, J D Crawford.   

Abstract

Establishing a coherent internal reference frame for visuospatial representation and maintaining the integrity of this frame during eye movements are thought to be crucial for both perception and motor control. A stable headcentric representation could be constructed by internally comparing retinal signals with eye position. Alternatively, visual memory traces could be actively remapped within an oculocentric frame to compensate for each eye movement. We tested these models by measuring errors in manual pointing (in complete darkness) toward briefly flashed central targets during three oculomotor paradigms; subjects pointed accurately when gaze was maintained on the target location (control paradigm). However, when steadily fixating peripheral locations (static paradigm), subjects exaggerated the retinal eccentricity of the central target by 13.4 +/- 5.1%. In the key "dynamic" paradigm, subjects briefly foveated the central target and then saccaded peripherally before pointing toward the remembered location of the target. Our headcentric model predicted accurate pointing (as seen in the control paradigm) independent of the saccade, whereas our oculocentric model predicted misestimation (as seen in the static paradigm) of an internally shifted retinotopic trace. In fact, pointing errors were significantly larger than were control errors (p </= 0.003) and were indistinguishable (p >/= 0.25) from the static paradigm errors. Scatter plots of pointing errors (dynamic vs static paradigm) for various final fixation directions showed an overall slope of 0.97, contradicting the headcentric prediction (0. 0) and supporting the oculocentric prediction (1.0). Varying both fixation and pointing-target direction confirmed that these errors were a function of retinotopically shifted memory traces rather than eye position per se. To reconcile these results with previous pointing experiments, we propose a "conversion-on-demand" model of visuomotor control in which multiple visual targets are stored and rotated (noncommutatively) within the oculocentric frame, whereas only select targets are transformed further into head- or bodycentric frames for motor execution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9454863      PMCID: PMC6792733     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  49 in total

1.  Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  L H Snyder; A P Batista; R A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The role of ocular muscle proprioception in visual localization of targets.

Authors:  G M Gauthier; D Nommay; J L Vercher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Proprioceptive knowledge of eye position.

Authors:  M J Steinbach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Buneo; U Herrmann; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The non-visual impact of eye orientation on eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  J T Enright
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Auditory receptive fields in primate superior colliculus shift with changes in eye position.

Authors:  M F Jay; D L Sparks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 May 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Saccades are spatially, not retinocentrically, coded.

Authors:  L E Mays; D L Sparks
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Information used by the perceptual and oculomotor systems regarding the amplitude of saccadic and pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  J M Miller
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; J F Kalaska; R Caminiti; J T Massey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  M F Walker; E J Fitzgibbon; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  112 in total

1.  Curvature of visual space under vertical eye rotation: implications for spatial vision and visuomotor control.

Authors:  J D Crawford; D Y Henriques; T Vilis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Task-dependent constraints in motor control: pinhole goggles make the head move like an eye.

Authors:  M Ceylan; D Y Henriques; D B Tweed; J D Crawford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Self-organizing task modules and explicit coordinate systems in a neural network model for 3-D saccades.

Authors:  M A Smith; J D Crawford
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head.

Authors:  D Y P Henriques; W P Medendorp; C C A M Gielen; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

Authors:  David Whitney; David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Representation of heading direction in far and near head space.

Authors:  Ervin Poljac; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory.

Authors:  W Pieter Medendorp; Douglas B Tweed; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Quickly tapping targets that are flashed during smooth pursuit reveals perceptual mislocalisations.

Authors:  Gerben Rotman; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Auditory signals evolve from hybrid- to eye-centered coordinates in the primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jungah Lee; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.