Literature DB >> 23076429

Influence of age, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on localization of auditory, visual, and bimodal targets by human subjects.

Marina S Dobreva1, William E O'Neill, Gary D Paige.   

Abstract

A common complaint of the elderly is difficulty identifying and localizing auditory and visual sources, particularly in competing background noise. Spatial errors in the elderly may pose challenges and even threats to self and others during everyday activities, such as localizing sounds in a crowded room or driving in traffic. In this study, we investigated the influence of aging, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on the localization of auditory, visual, and combined auditory-visual (bimodal) targets. Head-restrained young and elderly subjects localized targets in a dark, echo-attenuated room using a manual laser pointer. Localization accuracy and precision (repeatability) were quantified for both ongoing and transient (remembered) targets at response delays up to 10 s. Because eye movements bias auditory spatial perception, localization was assessed under target fixation (eyes free, pointer guided by foveal vision) and central fixation (eyes fixed straight ahead, pointer guided by peripheral vision) conditions. Spatial localization across the frontal field in young adults demonstrated (1) horizontal overshoot and vertical undershoot for ongoing auditory targets under target fixation conditions, but near-ideal horizontal localization with central fixation; (2) accurate and precise localization of ongoing visual targets guided by foveal vision under target fixation that degraded when guided by peripheral vision during central fixation; (3) overestimation in horizontal central space (±10°) of remembered auditory, visual, and bimodal targets with increasing response delay. In comparison with young adults, elderly subjects showed (1) worse precision in most paradigms, especially when localizing with peripheral vision under central fixation; (2) greatly impaired vertical localization of auditory and bimodal targets; (3) increased horizontal overshoot in the central field for remembered visual and bimodal targets across response delays; (4) greater vulnerability to visual bias with bimodal stimuli. Results highlight age-, memory-, and modality-dependent deterioration in the processing of auditory and visual space, as well as an age-related increase in the dominance of vision when localizing bimodal sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23076429     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3270-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  57 in total

1.  Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET.

Authors:  P A Reuter-Lorenz; J Jonides; E E Smith; A Hartley; A Miller; C Marshuetz; R A Koeppe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Neurophysiological signals of working memory in normal aging.

Authors:  L K McEvoy; E Pellouchoud; M E Smith; A Gevins
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-06

3.  Comparison of performance on memory-guided saccade and delayed spatial match-to-sample tasks in monkeys.

Authors:  Ioan Opris; Andrei Barborica; Vincent P Ferrera
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Comparison of horizontal head movements evoked by auditory and visual targets.

Authors:  J H Fuller
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Combined eye-head gaze shifts to visual and auditory targets in humans.

Authors:  J E Goldring; M C Dorris; B D Corneil; P A Ballantyne; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Eye and head movements to auditory targets.

Authors:  D A Whittington; M C Hepp-Reymond; W Flood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cross-modal perceptual integration of spatially and temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli.

Authors:  Jörg Lewald; Rainer Guski
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-05

8.  Age-related prefrontal alterations during auditory memory.

Authors:  L L Chao; R T Knight
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment.

Authors:  W Noble; D Byrne; B Lepage
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision.

Authors:  Marcel P Zwiers; A John Van Opstal; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  13 in total

1.  Age-related changes in auditory and visual interactions in temporal rate perception.

Authors:  Cassandra J Brooks; Andrew J Anderson; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Age-related hearing loss and ear morphology affect vertical but not horizontal sound-localization performance.

Authors:  Rik J Otte; Martijn J H Agterberg; Marc M Van Wanrooij; Ad F M Snik; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-15

3.  Comparison of congruence judgment and auditory localization tasks for assessing the spatial limits of visual capture.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Sarah E Brown; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Accumulation and decay of visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect caused by brief audio-visual disparities.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  The plastic ear and perceptual relearning in auditory spatial perception.

Authors:  Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty.

Authors:  Sara E Garcia; Pete R Jones; Gary S Rubin; Marko Nardini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Effects of Aging in Multisensory Integration: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alix L de Dieuleveult; Petra C Siemonsma; Jan B F van Erp; Anne-Marie Brouwer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Invisible Flashes Alter Perceived Sound Location.

Authors:  Patrycja Delong; Máté Aller; Anette S Giani; Tim Rohe; Verena Conrad; Masataka Watanabe; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Multiple time scales of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; David R Wozny; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.