Literature DB >> 19830514

Lung cancer screening and its efficacy.

Motoyasu Sagawa1, Katsuo Usuda, Hirokazu Aikawa, Yuichiro Machida, Makoto Tanaka, Masakatsu Ueno, Tsutomu Sakuma.   

Abstract

The efficacy of lung cancer screening should not be evaluated by the survival rate of lung cancer patients but by lung cancer mortality in a certain population because the survival rate can be greatly affected by several types of bias. Randomized controlled trials that were conducted during the 1970s and 1980s in Europe and the United States failed to prove the efficacy of lung cancer screening in decreasing the mortality rate; but recently the results of case-control studies in Japan have revealed that undergoing currently available screening decreases the risk of lung cancer deaths by 30%-60%. A system is now being created in Japan whereby the guidelines regarding cancer screening will continue to be updated. The preliminary reports concerning lung cancer screening using thoracic computed tomography revealed that not only the detection rate of lung cancer but also the survival rate of detected lung cancer patients were surprisingly high. However, the presence of some potential bias in these studies cannot be ignored; therefore, it is still unknown whether there is actual efficacy. Several randomized controlled trials are presently in progress overseas, but the interim results were not favorable. A randomized controlled trial should therefore immediately be started in Japan as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19830514     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-009-0448-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  30 in total

1.  Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D P Naidich; D F Yankelevitz; G McGuinness; D I McCauley; J P Smith; D Libby; M Pasmantier; M Vazquez; J Koizumi; D Flieder; N Altorki; O S Miettinen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The value of lung cancer detection by six-monthly chest radiographs.

Authors:  G Z Brett
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers.

Authors:  Stefan Diederich; Dag Wormanns; Michael Semik; Michael Thomas; Horst Lenzen; Nikolaus Roos; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evaluation of a clinic-based screening program for lung cancer with a case-control design in Kanagawa, Japan.

Authors:  N Okamoto; T Suzuki; H Hasegawa; T Gotoh; S Hagiwara; M Sekimoto; M Kaneko
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  John K Gohagan; Pamela M Marcus; Richard M Fagerstrom; Paul F Pinsky; Barnett S Kramer; Philip C Prorok; Susan Ascher; William Bailey; Brenda Brewer; Timothy Church; Deborah Engelhard; Melissa Ford; Mona Fouad; Matthew Freedman; Edward Gelmann; David Gierada; William Hocking; Subbarao Inampudi; Brian Irons; Christine Cole Johnson; Arthur Jones; Gena Kucera; Paul Kvale; Karen Lappe; William Manor; Alisha Moore; Hrudaya Nath; Sarah Neff; Martin Oken; Michael Plunkett; Helen Price; Douglas Reding; Thomas Riley; Martin Schwartz; David Spizarny; Roberta Yoffie; Carl Zylak
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Four years experience of the survey on quality control of lung cancer screening system in Japan.

Authors:  Motoyasu Sagawa; Chiaki Endo; Masami Sato; Yasuki Saito; Tomotaka Sobue; Katsuo Usuda; Hirokazu Aikawa; Shigefumi Fujimura; Tsutomu Sakuma
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  An evaluation of chest X-ray screening for lung cancer in gunma prefecture, Japan: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  T Nakayama; T Baba; T Suzuki; M Sagawa; M Kaneko
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  A 10 year follow-up of semi-annual screening for early detection of lung cancer in the Erfurt County, GDR.

Authors:  J Wilde
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.

Authors:  R S Fontana; D R Sanderson; L B Woolner; W F Taylor; W E Miller; J R Muhm; P E Bernatz; W S Payne; P C Pairolero; E J Bergstralh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; James R Jett; Ugo Pastorino; Melvyn S Tockman; Stephen J Swensen; Colin B Begg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  The assessment of the role of baseline low-dose CT scan in patients at high risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kołaczyk; Anna Walecka; Tomasz Grodzki; Jacek Alchimowicz; Andrzej Smereczyński; Radosław Kiedrowicz
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.