Literature DB >> 2776873

A 10 year follow-up of semi-annual screening for early detection of lung cancer in the Erfurt County, GDR.

J Wilde1.   

Abstract

A prospective and controlled study for early detection of lung cancer in the county of Erfurt with a follow-up of 10 years is presented. A collective of 41,532 males born between 1907 and 1932 was screened by chest fluorography at 6 month intervals and compared with a control group consisting of 102,348 males of the same age, who were screened at intervals of about 18 months. No significant reduction of overall mortality and of lung cancer mortality was achieved. Semi-annual screening brought about a higher detection rate (9%/6.5%), an increase in the resection rate (28%/19%) and higher 5 and 10 year survival rates (52%; 27%/39%; 19%) of resected patients than screening in 18 month intervals. Among those patients who refused resection or were surgically untreatable, the difference in survival rates between the two investigation groups lasted only up to the 12 months barrier. This is regarded as the effect of the lead-time bias. Fluorographic screening is effective only in patients with peripheral cancers. Patients resected for central lung cancers did not show differences in the survival rates. In both investigation groups considered together surgical therapy was possible mainly in those patients who had been detected by screening (resection rate: 48%; 5 yr survival rate: 26.9%). The resection rate of all the others amounted to 9%, the 5 yr survival rate to 1.4%. Therefore we consider fluorography to time as the only chance for lung cancer control of high risk groups in spite of the absence of reduction of lung cancer mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2776873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  [Opinion of the Austrian Society of Radiology and the Austrian Society of Pneumology].

Authors:  Helmut Prosch; Michael Studnicka; Edith Eisenhuber; Horst Olschewski; Elisabeth Stiefsohn; Sylvia Hartl; Christian Herold; Otto Burghuber; Gerhard Mostbeck
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Renée Manser; Anne Lethaby; Louis B Irving; Christine Stone; Graham Byrnes; Michael J Abramson; Don Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-21

Review 4.  Lung cancer screening and its efficacy.

Authors:  Motoyasu Sagawa; Katsuo Usuda; Hirokazu Aikawa; Yuichiro Machida; Makoto Tanaka; Masakatsu Ueno; Tsutomu Sakuma
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-10-16

Review 5.  Screening for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  R L Manser; L B Irving; G Byrnes; M J Abramson; C A Stone; D A Campbell
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  A population-based cohort study of chest x-ray screening in smokers: lung cancer detection findings and follow-up.

Authors:  Lorenzo Dominioni; Nicola Rotolo; William Mantovani; Albino Poli; Salvatore Pisani; Valentina Conti; Massimo Paolucci; Fausto Sessa; Antonio Paddeu; Vincenzo D'Ambrosio; Andrea Imperatori
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Duration of lead time in screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Jochanan Benbassat
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.317

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.