Literature DB >> 11443621

Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings.

C I Henschke1, D P Naidich, D F Yankelevitz, G McGuinness, D I McCauley, J P Smith, D Libby, M Pasmantier, M Vazquez, J Koizumi, D Flieder, N Altorki, O S Miettinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Early Lung Cancer Action Project (ELCAP) was designed to evaluate the usefulness of annual computed tomography (CT) screening for lung carcinoma. With the baseline results having been reported previously, the focus of the current study was on the early results of the repeat screenings.
METHODS: A cohort of 1000 high-risk individuals was recruited for baseline and annual repeat CT screening. At last follow-up, a total of 1184 annual repeat screenings had been performed. A positive result from the screening test was defined as newly detected, one to six noncalcified pulmonary nodules with interim growth. The diagnostic workup of the individuals was guided by recommendations supplied by the ELCAP investigators to the collaborating clinicians.
RESULTS: Of the 1184 repeat CT screenings, the test result was positive in 30 (2.5%). In 2 of these 30 cases, the individual died (of an unrelated cause) before diagnostic workup and the nodule(s) resolved in another 12 individuals. In the remaining 16 individuals, the absence of further growth was documented by repeat CT in 8 individuals and further growth was documented in the remaining 8 individuals. All eight individuals with further nodular growth underwent biopsy and malignancy was diagnosed in seven. Six of these seven malignancies were nonsmall cell carcinomas (five of which were Stage IA and one of which was Stage IIIA) and the one small cell carcinoma was found to be of limited stage. The median size dimension of these malignancies was 8 mm. In another two subjects, symptoms prompted the interim diagnosis of lung carcinoma. Neither of these malignancies was nodule-associated but rather were endobronchial; one was a Stage IIB nonsmall cell carcinoma and the other was a small cell carcinoma of limited stage.
CONCLUSIONS: False-positive screening test results are uncommon and usually manageable without biopsy; compared with no screening, such screenings permit diagnosis at substantially earlier and thus more curable stages. Annual repetition of CT screening is sufficient to minimize symptom-prompted interim diagnoses of nodule-associated malignancies. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443621     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:1<153::aid-cncr1303>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  81 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of non-calcified pulmonary nodules (<10 mm) identified during low-dose CT screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael M Slattery; Claire Foley; Dermot Kenny; Richard W Costello; P Mark Logan; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Timothy R Church; Richard M Fagerstrom; Barbara Galen; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Jonathan Goldin; John K Gohagan; Bruce Hillman; Carl Jaffe; Barnett S Kramer; David Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Mitchell Schnall; Daniel C Sullivan; Dorothy Sullivan; Carl J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Resolving small pulmonary nodules: CT features.

Authors:  S Diederich; J Hansen; D Wormanns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Intrapulmonary metastasis developing eighteen years after complete resection of thymoma.

Authors:  Mamoru Uemura; Masahiko Higashiyama; Jiro Okami; Kazuyuki Oda; Koji Takami; Ken Kodama
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-07

5.  Is screening for lung cancer using low dose spiral CT scanning worthwhile?

Authors:  F V Gleeson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Accuracy of automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules across different multislice CT scanners.

Authors:  Marco Das; Julia Ley-Zaporozhan; H A Gietema; Andre Czech; Georg Mühlenbruch; Andreas H Mahnken; Markus Katoh; Annemarie Bakai; Marcos Salganicoff; Stefan Diederich; Mathias Prokop; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Unleashing the power of proteomics to develop blood-based cancer markers.

Authors:  Ayumu Taguchi; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 8.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Antonio Gutierrez; Robert Suh; Fereidoun Abtin; Scott Genshaft; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications.

Authors:  Madeline Vazquez; Darryl Carter; Elizabeth Brambilla; Adi Gazdar; Masayuki Noguchi; William D Travis; Yao Huang; Lijuan Zhang; Rowena Yip; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Computed tomography assessment of response to therapy: tumor volume change measurement, truth data, and error.

Authors:  Michael F McNitt-Gray; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Marios A Gavrielides; Charles Fenimore; Geoffrey McLennan; Nicholas Petrick; Binsheng Zhao; Anthony P Reeves; Reinhard Beichel; Hyun-Jung Grace Kim; Lisa Kinnard
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.