Literature DB >> 19826871

Automated detection of radiology reports that document non-routine communication of critical or significant results.

Paras Lakhani1, Curtis P Langlotz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to develop an automated method to accurately detect radiology reports that indicate non-routine communication of critical or significant results. Such a classification system would be valuable for performance monitoring and accreditation. Using a database of 2.3 million free-text radiology reports, a rule-based query algorithm was developed after analyzing hundreds of radiology reports that indicated communication of critical or significant results to a healthcare provider. This algorithm consisted of words and phrases used by radiologists to indicate such communications combined with specific handcrafted rules. This algorithm was iteratively refined and retested on hundreds of reports until the precision and recall did not significantly change between iterations. The algorithm was then validated on the entire database of 2.3 million reports, excluding those reports used during the testing and refinement process. Human review was used as the reference standard. The accuracy of this algorithm was determined using precision, recall, and F measure. Confidence intervals were calculated using the adjusted Wald method. The developed algorithm for detecting critical result communication has a precision of 97.0% (95% CI, 93.5-98.8%), recall 98.2% (95% CI, 93.4-100%), and F measure of 97.6% (ß=1). Our query algorithm is accurate for identifying radiology reports that contain non-routine communication of critical or significant results. This algorithm can be applied to a radiology reports database for quality control purposes and help satisfy accreditation requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19826871      PMCID: PMC2978900          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9237-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

1.  Automated extraction and normalization of findings from cancer-related free-text radiology reports.

Authors:  Burke W Mamlin; Daniel T Heinze; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

2.  Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Adam S Rothschild
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Using an automated coding and review process to communicate critical radiologic findings: one way to skin a cat.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Development and validation of queries using structured query language (SQL) to determine the utilization of comparison imaging in radiology reports stored on PACS.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Elliot D Menschik; Alberto F Goldszal; Joseph P Murray; Mark G Weiner; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Communicating radiology results.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Doing better with critical test results.

Authors:  David W Bates; Lucian L Leape
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2005-02

7.  A field theoretical approach to medical natural language processing.

Authors:  Ricky K Taira; Vijayaraghavan Bashyam; Hooshang Kangarloo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2007-07

8.  Finding malignant findings from radiological reports using medical attributes and syntactic information.

Authors:  Takeshi Imai; Eiji Aramaki; Masayuki Kajino; Kengo Miyo; Yuzo Onogi; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2007

9.  Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; C Friedman; P O Alderson; W DuMouchel; S B Johnson; P D Clayton
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Communication outcomes of critical imaging results in a computerized notification system.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Harvinder S Arora; Meena S Vij; Raghuram Rao; Myrna M Khan; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  9 in total

1.  Automated detection of critical results in radiology reports.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Woojin Kim; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Imaging informatics: essential tools for the delivery of imaging services.

Authors:  David S Mendelson; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  A Roadmap for Foundational Research on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From the 2018 NIH/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop.

Authors:  Curtis P Langlotz; Bibb Allen; Bradley J Erickson; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keith Bigelow; Tessa S Cook; Adam E Flanders; Matthew P Lungren; David S Mendelson; Jeffrey D Rudie; Ge Wang; Krishna Kandarpa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A study of actions in operative notes.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Serguei Pakhomov; Nora E Burkart; James O Ryan; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  Automatic Determination of the Need for Intravenous Contrast in Musculoskeletal MRI Examinations Using IBM Watson's Natural Language Processing Algorithm.

Authors:  Hari Trivedi; Joseph Mesterhazy; Benjamin Laguna; Thienkhai Vu; Jae Ho Sohn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

7.  What does the orthopaedic surgeon want in the radiology report?

Authors:  Karthikeyan P Iyengar; Vivien Qi Jun Ngo; Vijay Kumar Jain; Neeraj Ahuja; Zuned Hakim; Chetan Sangani
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-07-24

8.  Assessment of a Machine Learning Model Applied to Harmonized Electronic Health Record Data for the Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Premanand Tiwari; Kathryn L Colborn; Derek E Smith; Fuyong Xing; Debashis Ghosh; Michael A Rosenberg
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03

9.  Prediction of incident myocardial infarction using machine learning applied to harmonized electronic health record data.

Authors:  Divneet Mandair; Premanand Tiwari; Steven Simon; Kathryn L Colborn; Michael A Rosenberg
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.