Literature DB >> 15791765

Doing better with critical test results.

David W Bates, Lucian L Leape.   

Abstract

Health care should achieve the goals that no critical test result is lost and that all such results are managed with a speed appropriate to their urgency.

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 15791765     DOI： 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31010-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN： 1553-7250


  13 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of automated notification and customer service call centers for timely and accurate reporting of critical values: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Edward B Liebow; James H Derzon; John Fontanesi; Alessandra M Favoretto; Rich Ann Baetz; Colleen Shaw; Pamela Thompson; Diana Mass; Robert Christenson; Paul Epner; Susan R Snyder
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Unintended errors with EHR-based result management: a case series.

Authors:  Thomas R Yackel; Peter J Embi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Incidence and predictors of microbiology results returning postdischarge and requiring follow-up.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Christopher Roy; Gregor Brodsky; Molly Perencevich; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Lindsey Wilson; Brian Reis; Mona K Sawhney; Donna Espadas; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain?

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Eric J Thomas; Dean F Sittig; Lindsey Wilson; Donna Espadas; Myrna M Khan; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Learning from incident reports in the Australian medical imaging setting: handover and communication errors.

Authors:  N Hannaford; C Mandel; C Crock; K Buckley; F Magrabi; M Ong; S Allen; T Schultz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential?

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Eric J Thomas; Shrinidi Mani; Dean Sittig; Harvinder Arora; Donna Espadas; Myrna M Khan; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-28

8.  Communication outcomes of critical imaging results in a computerized notification system.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Harvinder S Arora; Meena S Vij; Raghuram Rao; Myrna M Khan; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Automated detection of radiology reports that document non-routine communication of critical or significant results.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Lindsey Wilson; Laura A Petersen; Mona K Sawhney; Brian Reis; Donna Espadas; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.796
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.