Literature DB >> 16132483

Development and validation of queries using structured query language (SQL) to determine the utilization of comparison imaging in radiology reports stored on PACS.

Paras Lakhani1, Elliot D Menschik, Alberto F Goldszal, Joseph P Murray, Mark G Weiner, Curtis P Langlotz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop queries that quantify the utilization of comparison imaging in free-text radiology reports. The queries searched for common phrases that indicate whether comparison imaging was utilized, not available, or not mentioned. The queries were iteratively refined and tested on random samples of 100 reports with human review as a reference standard until the precision and recall of the queries did not improve significantly between iterations. Then, query accuracy was assessed on a new random sample of 200 reports. Overall accuracy of the queries was 95.6%. The queries were then applied to a database of 1.8 million reports. Comparisons were made to prior images in 38.69% of the reports (693,955/1,793,754), were unavailable in 18.79% (337,028/1,793,754), and were not mentioned in 42.52% (762,771/1,793,754). The results show that queries of text reports can achieve greater than 95% accuracy in determining the utilization of prior images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16132483      PMCID: PMC3043946          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-005-7667-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  17 in total

1.  Malpractice issues in radiology. American College of Radiology Standard for Communication.

Authors:  P N Cascade; L Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; F J Hooper; S Pomerantz; A Dahlke; D Rallis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Must new radiographs be compared with all previous radiographs, or only with the most recently obtained radiographs?

Authors:  L Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Detection of lung cancer on the chest radiograph: impact of previous films, clinical information, double reading, and dual reading.

Authors:  L G Quekel; R Goei; A G Kessels; J M van Engelshoven
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Opinion: is it time for 'PACSter'?

Authors:  D S Channin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination.

Authors:  Jules H Sumkin; Brenda L Holbert; Jennifer S Herrmann; Christiane A Hakim; Marie A Ganott; William R Poller; Ratan Shah; Lara A Hardesty; David Gur
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Comparing new radiographs with those obtained previously.

Authors:  L Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  C L Christiansen; F Wang; M B Barton; W Kreuter; J G Elmore; A E Gelfand; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Roland Hustinx; François Bénard; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.446

10.  Multi-detector computed tomography and 3-dimensional imaging in a multi-vendor picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) environment.

Authors:  P M A Van Ooijen; A H H Bongaerts; R Witkamp; A Wijker; W Tukker; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  5 in total

1.  Synchronized navigation of current and prior studies using image registration improves radiologist's efficiency.

Authors:  Daniel Forsberg; Amit Gupta; Christopher Mills; Brett MacAdam; Beverly Rosipko; Barbara A Bangert; Michael D Coffey; Christos Kosmas; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Quality Management of Pulmonary Nodule Radiology Reports Based on Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  Xiaolu Fei; Pengyu Chen; Lan Wei; Yue Huang; Yi Xin; Jia Li
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Automated detection of radiology reports that document non-routine communication of critical or significant results.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Ascertainment of Aspirin Exposure Using Structured and Unstructured Large-scale Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  Ranier Bustamante; Ashley Earles; James D Murphy; Alex K Bryant; Olga V Patterson; Andrew J Gawron; Tonya Kaltenbach; Mary A Whooley; Deborah A Fisher; Sameer D Saini; Samir Gupta; Lin Liu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Consultation and citation rates for prior imaging studies and documents in radiology.

Authors:  Tamara Miner Haygood; Barry Mullins; Jia Sun; Behrang Amini; Priya Bhosale; Hyunseon C Kang; Tara Sagebiel; Bilal Mujtaba
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-05-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.