Literature DB >> 19821108

Dose distribution verifications of IMRT for NPC.

Qin Li1, Liang Li, Jun Han, Zhiwen Liang.   

Abstract

In order to explore a dose distribution verification procedure of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and establish its evaluation criteria, we performed 35 two-dimensional (2D) patient-specific IMRT verifications over the year 2006. The percent of pixels passing gamma and the normalized agreement test (NAT) index were mainly used to represent the agreement between the measured and computed dose distributions with three criteria (2%/2 mm, 3%/3 mm and 5%/3 mm) as recommended in the literature. The results were that all cases passed through verifications with three criteria except that the NAT index of one case was beyond the limitation, and the three tolerance levels of 2%/2 mm, 3%/3 mm and 5%/3 mm produced similar clinical verification results but led to different percent of pixels passing gamma and NAT index. Our data showed that the percent of pixels passing gamma and the NAT index were complementary to evaluate future IMRT verifications as two significant metrics. Due to the influence of the noise and the trait of the software, we considered an IMRT plan as acceptable in case of the percent of pixels passing gamma >95% and the NAT index <5 with the 5%/3 mm criteria for IMRT patient-specific quality assurance (QA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19821108     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-009-0528-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  17 in total

Review 1.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Rapid radiographic film calibration for IMRT verification using automated MLC fields.

Authors:  Nathan L Childress; Lei Dong; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The design and testing of novel clinical parameters for dose comparison.

Authors:  Nathan L Childress; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Effect of processing time delay on the dose response of Kodak EDR2 film.

Authors:  Nathan L Childress; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Performance analysis of a film dosimetric quality assurance procedure for IMRT with regard to the employment of quantitative evaluation methods.

Authors:  Peter Winkler; Brigitte Zurl; Helmuth Guss; Peter Kindl; Georg Stuecklschweiger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Retrospective analysis of 2D patient-specific IMRT verifications.

Authors:  Nathan L Childress; R Allen White; Charles Bloch; Mohammad Salehpour; Lei Dong; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  TG-69: radiographic film for megavoltage beam dosimetry.

Authors:  Sujatha Pai; Indra J Das; James F Dempsey; Kwok L Lam; Thomas J Losasso; Arthur J Olch; Jatinder R Palta; Lawrence E Reinstein; Dan Ritt; Ellen E Wilcox
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Evaluation of polymer gels and MRI as a 3-D dosimeter for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  D A Low; J F Dempsey; R Venkatesan; S Mutic; J Markman; E Mark Haacke; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications.

Authors:  Nathan L Childress; Mohammad Salehpour; Lei Dong; Charles Bloch; R Allen White; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers.

Authors:  J Van Dyk; R B Barnett; J E Cygler; P C Shragge
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-05-20       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.