Literature DB >> 15789600

Dosimetric accuracy of Kodak EDR2 film for IMRT verifications.

Nathan L Childress1, Mohammad Salehpour, Lei Dong, Charles Bloch, R Allen White, Isaac I Rosen.   

Abstract

Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) verifications require an accurate two-dimensional dosimeter that is not labor-intensive. We assessed the precision and reproducibility of film calibrations over time, measured the elemental composition of the film, measured the intermittency effect, and measured the dosimetric accuracy and reproducibility of calibrated Kodak EDR2 film for single-beam verifications in a solid water phantom and for full-plan verifications in a Rexolite phantom. Repeated measurements of the film sensitometric curve in a single experiment yielded overall uncertainties in dose of 2.1% local and 0.8% relative to 300 cGy. 547 film calibrations over an 18-month period, exposed to a range of doses from 0 to a maximum of 240 MU or 360 MU and using 6 MV or 18 MV energies, had optical density (OD) standard deviations that were 7%-15% of their average values. This indicates that daily film calibrations are essential when EDR2 film is used to obtain absolute dose results. An elemental analysis of EDR2 film revealed that it contains 60% as much silver and 20% as much bromine as Kodak XV2 film. EDR2 film also has an unusual 1.69:1 silver:halide molar ratio, compared with the XV2 film's 1.02:1 ratio, which may affect its chemical reactions. To test EDR2's intermittency effect, the OD generated by a single 300 MU exposure was compared to the ODs generated by exposing the film 1 MU, 2 MU, and 4 MU at a time to a total of 300 MU. An ion chamber recorded the relative dose of all intermittency measurements to account for machine output variations. Using small MU bursts to expose the film resulted in delivery times of 4 to 14 minutes and lowered the film's OD by approximately 2% for both 6 and 18 MV beams. This effect may result in EDR2 film underestimating absolute doses for patient verifications that require long delivery times. After using a calibration to convert EDR2 film's OD to dose values, film measurements agreed within 2% relative difference and 2 mm criteria to ion chamber measurements for both sliding window and step-and-shoot fluence map verifications. Calibrated film results agreed with ion chamber measurements to within 5 % /2 mm criteria for transverse-plane full-plan verifications, but were consistently low. When properly calibrated, EDR2 film can be an adequate two-dimensional dosimeter for IMRT verifications, although it may underestimate doses in regions with long exposure times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15789600     DOI: 10.1118/1.1852791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Dose distribution verifications of IMRT for NPC.

Authors:  Qin Li; Liang Li; Jun Han; Zhiwen Liang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-11

2.  Quantitative megavoltage radiation therapy dosimetry using the storage phosphor KCl: Eu2+.

Authors:  Zhaohui Han; Joseph P Driewer; Yuanshui Zheng; Daniel A Low; H Harold Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetry and evaluating the effect of treatment parameters on the leakage of multi leaf collimators in ONCOR linear accelerators.

Authors:  Keyvan Jabbari; Muhaddeseh Akbari; Mohamad Bagher Tavakoli; Alireza Amouheidari
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-12-27

4.  Absolute dose verification of static intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with ion chambers of various volumes and TLD detectors.

Authors:  Hediye Acun-Bucht; Ebru Tuncay; Emin Darendeliler; Gönül Kemikler
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-05-19

5.  Calculation of excess dose to the eye phantom due to a distanced shielding for electron therapy in head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Keyvan Jabbari; Mahnaz Roayaei; Hosein Saberi
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2012-07

6.  Evaluation of a software system for estimating planned dose error in patients, based on planar IMRT QA measurements.

Authors:  Mohammad Bakhtiari; Ashkan Parniani; Fritz Lerma; Shannon Reynolds; James Jordan; Alireza Sedaghat; Mehrdad Sarfaraz; James Rodgers
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Fast, simple, and informative patient-specific dose verification method for intensity modulated total marrow irradiation with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Yutaka Takahashi; Susanta K Hui
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Reproducibility in patient-specific IMRT QA.

Authors:  Elizabeth M McKenzie; Peter A Balter; Francesco C Stingo; Jimmy Jones; David S Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Effects of spatial resolution and noise on gamma analysis for IMRT QA.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; Kiley B Pulliam; Elizabeth M McKenzie; David S Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Analysis of the sources of uncertainty for EDR2 film-based IMRT quality assurance.

Authors:  Chengyu Shi; Nikos Papanikolaou; Yulong Yan; Xuejun Weng; Hongyu Jiang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.