Literature DB >> 19815786

Inhibition is picky: shape difference is a necessary condition for attentional inhibition of irrelevant objects.

Peter Wühr1, Christian Frings.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the conditions for attentional amplification in the processing of relevant objects and for attentional inhibition in the processing of irrelevant objects. Participants reported the color of one of two superimposed objects that was specified by occlusion. Irrelevant color words were presented as part of the relevant object, as part of the irrelevant object, or in the background; the words were either congruent or incongruent with the color of the relevant object. The size of the congruency effects provided a measure of the (relative) strength of the processing of the objects and the background. Finally, the two objects had the same shape in one session and different shapes in another session. In both sessions, results showed larger Stroop effects from words belonging to the relevant object than from words in the background, indicating attentional amplification of the relevant object that was unaffected by object similarity. In contrast, smaller Stroop effects from words belonging to the irrelevant object than from words in the background occurred only when the two objects differed in shape. The latter result suggests that a shape difference is both a necessary and a sufficient condition for inhibiting the processing of an irrelevant visual object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815786     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

2.  Depth cues do not underlie attentional modulations of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Martina Weltle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

3.  Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming.

Authors:  Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  A Stroop effect for spatial orientation.

Authors:  Peter Wühr
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2007-07

5.  A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Christian Frings
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-02

6.  Prime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Peter Wühr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

7.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

8.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

9.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

Authors:  B Milliken; S Joordens; P M Merikle; A E Seiffert
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Elaine Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.