Literature DB >> 9577237

Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

B Milliken1, S Joordens, P M Merikle, A E Seiffert.   

Abstract

The notion that inhibitory processes play a critical role in selective attention has gained wide support. Much of this support derives from studies of negative priming. The authors note that the attribution of negative priming to an inhibitory mechanism of attention draws its support from a common assumption underlying priming procedures, together with the procedure that has been used to measure negative priming. The results from a series of experiments demonstrate that selection between 2 competing prime items is not required to observe negative priming. This result is demonstrated across several experiments in which participants named 1 of 2 items in a second display following presentation of a single-item prime. The implications of these results for existing theories of negative priming are discussed, and a theoretical framework for interpreting negative priming and several related phenomena is forwarded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9577237     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  47 in total

1.  The effect of memory load on negative priming: an individual differences investigation.

Authors:  A R Conway; S W Tuholski; R J Shisler; R W Engle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  The time-course of negative priming: little evidence for episodic trace retrieval.

Authors:  A R Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

3.  Deeper processing at target selection increases the magnitude of negative priming.

Authors:  P L Yee; K E Santoro; A L Grey; V Woog
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

4.  Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: attention to distractors does not eliminate negative priming, it enhances it.

Authors:  P A MacDonald; S Joordens; K N Seergobin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

5.  Stroop interference and negative priming: problems with inferences from null results.

Authors:  P Marí-Beffa; A F Estévez; S Danziger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

6.  The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.

Authors:  D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

7.  Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: evidence for early selection.

Authors:  L Paquet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

8.  Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search.

Authors:  H Koshino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

9.  Working memory and stroop interference: an individual differences investigation.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

10.  The power of human brain magnetoencephalographic signals can be modulated up or down by changes in an attentive visual task.

Authors:  Yanqing Chen; Anil K Seth; Joseph A Gally; Gerald M Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.