Literature DB >> 18248132

A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.

Peter Wühr1, Christian Frings.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the ability to inhibit the processing of an irrelevant visual object while processing a relevant one. Participants were presented with 2 overlapping shapes (e.g., circle and square) in different colors. The task was to name the color of the relevant object designated by shape. Congruent or incongruent color words appeared in the relevant object, in the irrelevant object, or in the background. Stroop effects indicated how strong the respective area of the display was processed. The results of 4 experiments showed that words in the relevant object produced larger Stroop effects than words in the background, indicating amplification of relevant objects. In addition, words in the irrelevant object consistently produced smaller Stroop effects than words in the background, indicating inhibition of irrelevant objects. Control experiments replicated these findings with brief display durations (250 ms) and ruled out perceptual factors as a possible explanation. In summary, results support the notion of an inhibitory mechanism of object-based attention, which can be applied in addition to the amplification of relevant objects. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18248132     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  15 in total

1.  Unraveling the sub-processes of selective attention: insights from dynamic modeling and continuous behavior.

Authors:  Simon Frisch; Maja Dshemuchadse; Max Görner; Thomas Goschke; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-02

Review 2.  Dissociating speed and accuracy in absolute identification: the effect of unequal stimulus spacing.

Authors:  Christopher Donkin; Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote; A A J Marley
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-08-13

3.  Visual short-term memory guides infants' visual attention.

Authors:  Samantha G Mitsven; Lisa M Cantrell; Steven J Luck; Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-04-25

4.  Inhibition is picky: shape difference is a necessary condition for attentional inhibition of irrelevant objects.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

Review 5.  The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Elaine Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

6.  Genes of the dopaminergic system selectively modulate top-down but not bottom-up attention.

Authors:  Katja Kerstin Schneider; Andrea B Schote; Jobst Meyer; Christian Frings
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Response interference in touch, vision, and crossmodally: beyond the spatial dimension.

Authors:  Frank Mast; Christian Frings; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Object-based attention overrides perceptual load to modulate visual distraction.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Hyper-binding: a unique age effect.

Authors:  Karen L Campbell; Lynn Hasher; Ruthann C Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-19

10.  Effects of speech rate and practice on the allocation of visual attention in multiple object naming.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Linda Wheeldon; Femke van der Meulen; Agnieszka Konopka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.