Literature DB >> 17691149

Prime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks.

Christian Frings1, Peter Wühr.   

Abstract

Responses to probe targets that have been distractors in a prime display are slower than responses to new targets, a finding called negative priming (NP). The selective attention model, which attributes NP to lingering inhibition of the prime distractor, predicts that NP should occur only when the prime display has disappeared before the probe display is processed. The present study tested this prediction both in easy- and in difficult selection tasks. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3A, target selection was easy, and NP was observed only after prime display offset, regardless of whether offset was manipulated between or within participants. In Experiment 3B, target selection was difficult, and NP was found with and without prime display offset. Experiment 4 replicated the finding of NP without prime display offset in a difficult-selection task. A modified version of the selective attention model can explain the results of the present study. However, we also discuss the results in light of episodic retrieval theory and temporal discrimination theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17691149     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Taking a bright view of negative priming in the light of dim stimuli: further evidence for memory confusion during episodic retrieval.

Authors:  J A Stolz; J H Neely
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2001-09

2.  Negative priming with masked distractor-only prime trials: awareness moderates negative priming.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2005

3.  Negative priming is stronger for task-relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in the selective ignoring of distractor information.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.

Authors:  E Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

Review 5.  Determinants of negative priming.

Authors:  C P May; M J Kane; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

Authors:  B Milliken; S Joordens; P M Merikle; A E Seiffert
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Dual mechanisms of negative priming.

Authors:  M J Kane; C P May; L Hasher; T Rahhal; E R Stoltzfus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Further investigations of inhibitory mechanisms in attention.

Authors:  D G Lowe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

9.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

10.  Examination of some aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test.

Authors:  E C Dalrymple-Alford; B Budayer
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1966-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Stefanie Kehrer; Antje Kraft; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stefan P Koch; Herbert Hagendorf; Norbert Kathmann; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-03

2.  Inhibition is picky: shape difference is a necessary condition for attentional inhibition of irrelevant objects.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

3.  Inhibition in the dynamics of selective attention: an integrative model for negative priming.

Authors:  Hecke Schrobsdorff; Matthias Ihrke; Jörg Behrendt; Marcus Hasselhorn; J Michael Herrmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-15

4.  Negative priming under rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Kin Fai Ellick Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.