BACKGROUND: Research has not established (1) if breast cancer screening varies by county-level proportion of uninsured or (2) whether county-level-proportion of uninsured correlates with county-level early-stage and late-stage breast cancer incidence. METHODS: A multilevel study was conducted to determine if individual-level self-reported breast cancer screening data from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) was associated with county-level-proportion-uninsured data from the 1999-2001 BRFSS. An ecologic study was conducted to determine if county-level proportion of uninsured correlated with incidence of early-stage and late-stage breast cancer using the 1999-2001 BRFSS data from the overlapping counties in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Data were analyzed in 2005. RESULTS: Women were less likely to be screened (prevalence odds ratio: 0.95; 95% confidence interval=0.93-0.97) with every 5% increasing county-level proportion of uninsured. African-American and Hispanic women who resided in counties with a proportion of uninsured of 9%-19% had higher screening utilization than white non-Hispanic women. The county-level-proportion of uninsured had little effect on screening use among women with household incomes less than $25,000 or greater than $75,000. Screening prevalence decreased with increasing county-level proportion of uninsured among women with intermediate income. The rate of T1 (<2 cm diameter) tumors decreased with increasing county-level proportion of uninsured while controlling for poverty rate; Spearman correlation -0.294. CONCLUSIONS: High county-level proportions of uninsured may lead to lower early-stage breast-cancer incidence through lower screening use among women living in these less-well-insured counties.
BACKGROUND: Research has not established (1) if breast cancer screening varies by county-level proportion of uninsured or (2) whether county-level-proportion of uninsured correlates with county-level early-stage and late-stage breast cancer incidence. METHODS: A multilevel study was conducted to determine if individual-level self-reported breast cancer screening data from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) was associated with county-level-proportion-uninsured data from the 1999-2001 BRFSS. An ecologic study was conducted to determine if county-level proportion of uninsured correlated with incidence of early-stage and late-stage breast cancer using the 1999-2001 BRFSS data from the overlapping counties in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Data were analyzed in 2005. RESULTS:Women were less likely to be screened (prevalence odds ratio: 0.95; 95% confidence interval=0.93-0.97) with every 5% increasing county-level proportion of uninsured. African-American and Hispanic women who resided in counties with a proportion of uninsured of 9%-19% had higher screening utilization than white non-Hispanic women. The county-level-proportion of uninsured had little effect on screening use among women with household incomes less than $25,000 or greater than $75,000. Screening prevalence decreased with increasing county-level proportion of uninsured among women with intermediate income. The rate of T1 (<2 cm diameter) tumors decreased with increasing county-level proportion of uninsured while controlling for poverty rate; Spearman correlation -0.294. CONCLUSIONS: High county-level proportions of uninsured may lead to lower early-stage breast-cancer incidence through lower screening use among women living in these less-well-insured counties.
Authors: Florence K L Tangka; Joseph Dalaker; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; James G Gardner; Janet Royalty; Ingrid J E Hall; Amy DeGroff; Donald K Blackman; Ralph J Coates Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; David H Rehkopf; S V Subramanian Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ronald M Andersen; Hongjian Yu; Roberta Wyn; Pamela L Davidson; E Richard Brown; Stephanie Teleki Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Jenine K Harris; Julianne Cyr; Bobbi J Carothers; Nancy B Mueller; Victoria V Anwuri; Aimee I James Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jacqueline Casillas; Sharon M Castellino; Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Isac S F Lima; Qi Liu; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Carlos A Reyes-Ortiz; Karl Eschbach; Dong D Zhang; James S Goodwin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Anjali D Deshpande; Donna B Jeffe; Jennifer Gnerlich; Ayesha Z Iqbal; Abhishek Thummalakunta; Julie A Margenthaler Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2008-06-23 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Sandi L Pruitt; Matthew J Shim; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Sally W Vernon; Benjamin C Amick Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.254