Literature DB >> 7853053

Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis.

R E Slavin1.   

Abstract

Research review has long been one of the most important scholarly activities in all branches of science. While there is sometimes a single study so well-designed, well carried out, and difficult to replicate that its findings are accepted as conclusive, more often there are many studies on a given topic, no one of which clearly supersedes the others. These studies may be done by different investigators using different methods or different populations. They may arrive at different conclusions. When this is the case, there is a need for reviewers to carefully consider the evidence and to put forth conclusions or hypotheses about where the weight of the evidence lies.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7853053     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00097-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  141 in total

1.  Cochrane Reviews: new blocks on the kids.

Authors:  I Shrier
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  [Meta-analysis. A meaningful tool for evidence-based (intensive) medicine].

Authors:  M R Tramèr
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Workplace-based work disability prevention interventions for workers with common mental health conditions: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Georgia Pomaki; Renée-Louise Franche; Eleanor Murray; Noushin Khushrushahi; Thomas M Lampinen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-06

4.  Introduction to special section: systematic reviews for prevention and management of musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Emma Irvin; Dwayne Van Eerd; Benjamin C Amick; Shelley Brewer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-06

Review 5.  Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Kimberley Cullen; Judy Clarke; Emma Irvin; Sandra Sinclair; John Frank
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

6.  Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?

Authors:  David Ogilvie; Matt Egan; Val Hamilton; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Silvia Palma; Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations.

Authors:  Emile Tompa; Claire de Oliveira; Roman Dolinschi; Emma Irvin
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-02-08

9.  Open, Arthroscopic, and Percutaneous Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew B Burn; Ronald J Mitchell; Shari R Liberman; David M Lintner; Joshua D Harris; Patrick C McCulloch
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-03-24

10.  The impact of the CONSORT statement on reporting of randomized clinical trials in psychiatry.

Authors:  Changsu Han; Kyung-phil Kwak; David M Marks; Chi-Un Pae; Li-Tzy Wu; Kamal S Bhatia; Prakash S Masand; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.