Literature DB >> 19805409

Weighted feature significance: a simple, interpretable model of compound toxicity based on the statistical enrichment of structural features.

Ruili Huang1, Noel Southall, Menghang Xia, Ming-Hsuang Cho, Ajit Jadhav, Dac-Trung Nguyen, James Inglese, Raymond R Tice, Christopher P Austin.   

Abstract

In support of the U.S. Tox21 program, we have developed a simple and chemically intuitive model we call weighted feature significance (WFS) to predict the toxicological activity of compounds, based on the statistical enrichment of structural features in toxic compounds. We trained and tested the model on the following: (1) data from quantitative high-throughput screening cytotoxicity and caspase activation assays conducted at the National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center, (2) data from Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutagenicity assays conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program, and (3) hepatotoxicity data published in the Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. Enrichments of structural features in toxic compounds are evaluated for their statistical significance and compiled into a simple additive model of toxicity and then used to score new compounds for potential toxicity. The predictive power of the model for cytotoxicity was validated using an independent set of compounds from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency tested also at the National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center. We compared the performance of our WFS approach with classical classification methods such as Naive Bayesian clustering and support vector machines. In most test cases, WFS showed similar or slightly better predictive power, especially in the prediction of hepatotoxic compounds, where WFS appeared to have the best performance among the three methods. The new algorithm has the important advantages of simplicity, power, interpretability, and ease of implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805409      PMCID: PMC2777082          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  26 in total

1.  Symbolic, neural, and Bayesian machine learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemical compounds.

Authors:  D Bahler; B Stone; C Wellington; D W Bristol
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

2.  TOPS-MODE based QSARs derived from heterogeneous series of compounds. Applications to the design of new herbicides.

Authors:  Maykel Pérez González; Humberto Gonzalez Díaz; Reinaldo Molina Ruiz; Miguel A Cabrera; Ronal Ramos de Armas
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Making better drugs: Decision gates in non-clinical drug development.

Authors:  J Fred Pritchard; Malle Jurima-Romet; Mark L J Reimer; Elisabeth Mortimer; Brenda Rolfe; Mitchell N Cayen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity?

Authors:  Yvonne C Martin; James L Kofron; Linda M Traphagen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?

Authors:  Ismail Kola; John Landis
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  ESP: a method to predict toxicity and pharmacological properties of chemicals using multiple MCASE databases.

Authors:  Gilles Klopman; Suman K Chakravarti; Hao Zhu; Julian M Ivanov; Roustem D Saiakhov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

7.  Analysis of the registry of toxic effects of chemical substances (RTECS) files and conversion of the data in these files for input to the environmental chemicals data and information network (ECDIN).

Authors:  O Nørager; W G Town; J H Petrie
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  1978-08

8.  Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  Drug-protein adducts: an industry perspective on minimizing the potential for drug bioactivation in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  David C Evans; Alan P Watt; Deborah A Nicoll-Griffith; Thomas A Baillie
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Compound cytotoxicity profiling using quantitative high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Kristine L Witt; Noel Southall; Jennifer Fostel; Ming-Hsuang Cho; Ajit Jadhav; Cynthia S Smith; James Inglese; Christopher J Portier; Raymond R Tice; Christopher P Austin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  14 in total

1.  Naïve Bayesian Models for Vero Cell Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Alexander L Perryman; Jimmy S Patel; Riccardo Russo; Eric Singleton; Nancy Connell; Sean Ekins; Joel S Freundlich
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening for Aromatase Inhibitors in the Tox21 10K Library.

Authors:  Shiuan Chen; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Ruili Huang; Srilatha Sakamuru; Li-Yu Hsin; Menghang Xia; Keith R Shockley; Scott Auerbach; Noriko Kanaya; Hannah Lu; Daniel Svoboda; Kristine L Witt; B Alex Merrick; Christina T Teng; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  The future of toxicity testing: a focus on in vitro methods using a quantitative high-throughput screening platform.

Authors:  Sunita J Shukla; Ruili Huang; Christopher P Austin; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Mixed learning algorithms and features ensemble in hepatotoxicity prediction.

Authors:  Chin Yee Liew; Yen Ching Lim; Chun Wei Yap
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Prediction of Cytochrome P450 Profiles of Environmental Chemicals with QSAR Models Built from Drug-like Molecules.

Authors:  Hongmao Sun; Henrike Veith; Menghang Xia; Christopher P Austin; Raymond R Tice; Ruili Huang
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.353

6.  High-throughput respirometric assay identifies predictive toxicophore of mitochondrial injury.

Authors:  Lauren P Wills; Gyda C Beeson; Richard E Trager; Christopher C Lindsey; Craig C Beeson; Yuri K Peterson; Rick G Schnellmann
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 7.  The Tox21 robotic platform for the assessment of environmental chemicals--from vision to reality.

Authors:  Matias S Attene-Ramos; Nicole Miller; Ruili Huang; Sam Michael; Misha Itkin; Robert J Kavlock; Christopher P Austin; Paul Shinn; Anton Simeonov; Raymond R Tice; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 8.  The Salmonella mutagenicity assay: the stethoscope of genetic toxicology for the 21st century.

Authors:  Larry D Claxton; Gisela de A Umbuzeiro; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Chemical genomics profiling of environmental chemical modulation of human nuclear receptors.

Authors:  Ruili Huang; Menghang Xia; Ming-Hsuang Cho; Srilatha Sakamuru; Paul Shinn; Keith A Houck; David J Dix; Richard S Judson; Kristine L Witt; Robert J Kavlock; Raymond R Tice; Christopher P Austin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Improving the human hazard characterization of chemicals: a Tox21 update.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; John R Bucher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.