Literature DB >> 29959603

Naïve Bayesian Models for Vero Cell Cytotoxicity.

Alexander L Perryman1, Jimmy S Patel1, Riccardo Russo2, Eric Singleton2, Nancy Connell2, Sean Ekins3, Joel S Freundlich4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To advance translational research of potential therapeutic small molecules against infectious microbes, the compounds must display a relative lack of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Vero cell cytotoxicity (CC50) is a common initial assay for this metric. We explored the development of naïve Bayesian models that can enhance the probability of identifying non-cytotoxic compounds.
METHODS: Vero cell cytotoxicity assays were identified in PubChem, reformatted, and curated to create a training set with 8741 unique small molecules. These data were used to develop Bayesian classifiers, which were assessed with internal cross-validation, external tests with a set of 193 compounds from our laboratory, and independent validation with an additional diverse set of 1609 unique compounds from PubChem.
RESULTS: Evaluation with independent, external test and validation sets indicated that cytotoxicity Bayesian models constructed with the ECFP_6 descriptor were more accurate than those that used FCFP_6 fingerprints. The best cytotoxicity Bayesian model displayed predictive power in external evaluations, according to conventional and chance-corrected statistics, as well as enrichment factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from external tests demonstrate that our novel cytotoxicity Bayesian model displays sufficient predictive power to help guide translational research. To assist the chemical tool and drug discovery communities, our curated training set is being distributed as part of the Supplementary Material. Graphical Abstract Naive Bayesian models have been trained with publically available data and offer a useful tool for chemical biology and drug discovery to select for small molecules with a high probability of exhibiting acceptably low Vero cell cytotoxicity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian model; machine learning; predicting mammalian cytotoxicity; translational research; vero cell CC50

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959603      PMCID: PMC7768703          DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2439-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  41 in total

1.  The trouble with QSAR (or how I learned to stop worrying and embrace fallacy).

Authors:  Stephen R Johnson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Oversampling to overcome overfitting: exploring the relationship between data set composition, molecular descriptors, and predictive modeling methods.

Authors:  Chia-Yun Chang; Ming-Tsung Hsu; Emilio Xavier Esposito; Yufeng J Tseng
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Structural findings of phenylindoles as cytotoxic antimitotic agents in human breast cancer cell lines through multiple validated QSAR studies.

Authors:  Nilanjan Adhikari; Amit Kumar Halder; Achintya Saha; Krishna Das Saha; Tarun Jha
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Antony J Williams; Jinghai J Xu
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  QSAR treatment of multiple toxicities: the mutagenicity and cytotoxicity of quinolines.

Authors:  C J Smith; C Hansch; M J Morton
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1997-10-06       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  An information-intensive approach to the molecular pharmacology of cancer.

Authors:  J N Weinstein; T G Myers; P M O'Connor; S H Friend; A J Fornace; K W Kohn; T Fojo; S E Bates; L V Rubinstein; N L Anderson; J K Buolamwini; W W van Osdol; A P Monks; D A Scudiero; E A Sausville; D W Zaharevitz; B Bunow; V N Viswanadhan; G S Johnson; R E Wittes; K D Paull
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Understanding Cytotoxicity and Cytostaticity in a High-Throughput Screening Collection.

Authors:  Lewis H Mervin; Qing Cao; Ian P Barrett; Mike A Firth; David Murray; Lisa McWilliams; Malcolm Haddrick; Mark Wigglesworth; Ola Engkvist; Andreas Bender
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 8.  Comprehensive analysis of methods used for the evaluation of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Scott G Franzblau; Mary Ann DeGroote; Sang Hyun Cho; Koen Andries; Eric Nuermberger; Ian M Orme; Khisimuzi Mdluli; Iñigo Angulo-Barturen; Thomas Dick; Veronique Dartois; Anne J Lenaerts
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.131

9.  Predicting cytotoxicity from heterogeneous data sources with Bayesian learning.

Authors:  Sarah R Langdon; Joanna Mulgrew; Gaia V Paolini; Willem P van Hoorn
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  PubChem's BioAssay Database.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Jewen Xiao; Tugba O Suzek; Jian Zhang; Jiyao Wang; Zhigang Zhou; Lianyi Han; Karen Karapetyan; Svetlana Dracheva; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Evan Bolton; Asta Gindulyte; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  8 in total

1.  Machine Learning Platform to Discover Novel Growth Inhibitors of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Janaina Cruz Pereira; Samer S Daher; Kimberley M Zorn; Matthew Sherwood; Riccardo Russo; Alexander L Perryman; Xin Wang; Madeleine J Freundlich; Sean Ekins; Joel S Freundlich
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  A Machine Learning Strategy for Drug Discovery Identifies Anti-Schistosomal Small Molecules.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Shengxi Sun; Cecelia L McConnon; Kelley Ma; Eric K Chen; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Lawrence J Liu; Nelly El-Sakkary; Danielle E Skinner; Sean Ekins; Conor R Caffrey
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.084

3.  Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Ana C Puhl; Kimberley M Zorn; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Jennifer J Klein; Anthony J Hickey; Alex M Clark
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Chalcones from Angelica keiskei (ashitaba) inhibit key Zika virus replication proteins.

Authors:  Melina Mottin; Lindsay K Caesar; David Brodsky; Nathalya C M R Mesquita; Ketllyn Zagato de Oliveira; Gabriela Dias Noske; Bruna K P Sousa; Paulo R P S Ramos; Hannah Jarmer; Bonnie Loh; Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Pedro M Torres; Rafael V C Guido; Glaucius Oliva; Frank Scholle; Sean Ekins; Nadja B Cech; Carolina H Andrade; Scott M Laster
Journal:  Bioorg Chem       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.307

5.  Pruned Machine Learning Models to Predict Aqueous Solubility.

Authors:  Alexander L Perryman; Daigo Inoyama; Jimmy S Patel; Sean Ekins; Joel S Freundlich
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Using Bibliometric Analysis and Machine Learning to Identify Compounds Binding to Sialidase-1.

Authors:  Jennifer J Klein; Nancy C Baker; Daniel H Foil; Kimberley M Zorn; Fabio Urbina; Ana C Puhl; Sean Ekins
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-01-20

7.  Random Forest Model Prediction of Compound Oral Exposure in the Mouse.

Authors:  Haseeb Mughal; Han Wang; Matthew Zimmerman; Marc D Paradis; Joel S Freundlich
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-01-26

8.  Bayesian Modeling and Intrabacterial Drug Metabolism Applied to Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jimmy S Patel; Javiera Norambuena; Hassan Al-Tameemi; Yong-Mo Ahn; Alexander L Perryman; Xin Wang; Samer S Daher; James Occi; Riccardo Russo; Steven Park; Matthew Zimmerman; Hsin-Pin Ho; David S Perlin; Véronique Dartois; Sean Ekins; Pradeep Kumar; Nancy Connell; Jeffrey M Boyd; Joel S Freundlich
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.578

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.