Literature DB >> 19802507

Population-based Canadian hip fracture rates with international comparisons.

W D Leslie1, S O'Donnell, C Lagacé, P Walsh, C Bancej, S Jean, K Siminoski, S Kaiser, D L Kendler, S Jaglal.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: We identified hospitalizations throughout Canada during 2000-2005 in which the most responsible diagnosis was a proximal femoral fracture. Use of the US fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) would be inappropriate for Canada as it would overestimate fracture risk in Canadian women and older men.
INTRODUCTION: It is recommended that the WHO fracture risk assessment tool should be calibrated to the target population.
METHODS: We identified hospitalizations for women and men throughout Canada during the study period 2000-2005 in which the most responsible diagnosis was a proximal femoral fracture (147,982 hip fractures). Age-standardized hip fracture rates were compared between Canadian provinces, and national rates were compared with those reported for the USA and Germany.
RESULTS: There were relatively small differences in hip fracture rates between provinces, and most did not differ appreciably from the Canadian average. Hip fracture rates for women in Canada in 2001 were substantially lower than in the USA (population-weighted rate ratio 0.70) and were also lower than in Germany for 2004 (population-weighted rate ratio 0.74).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall hip fracture rates for Canadian women were found to be substantially lower than those for the USA and Germany. This study underscores the importance of assessing country-specific fracture patterns prior to adopting an existing FRAX tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19802507      PMCID: PMC5101056          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1080-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  21 in total

1.  Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada.

Authors:  E A Papadimitropoulos; P C Coyte; R G Josse; C E Greenwood
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Trends in hospital care for hip fractures.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; J S Avrunin; E Puleo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000.

Authors:  David S Zingmond; L Joseph Melton; Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  A nationwide seven-year trend of hip fractures in the elderly population of Taiwan.

Authors:  Chung-Jung Shao; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Ching-Hui Tsai; Kuo-An Lai
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995-2004: a population-based study.

Authors:  A Icks; B Haastert; M Wildner; C Becker; G Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  30 in total

1.  Association Between Wait Time and 30-Day Mortality in Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Pincus; Bheeshma Ravi; David Wasserstein; Anjie Huang; J Michael Paterson; Avery B Nathens; Hans J Kreder; Richard J Jenkinson; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Independent external validation of nomograms for predicting risk of low-trauma fracture and hip fracture.

Authors:  Lisa Langsetmo; Tuan V Nguyen; Nguyen D Nguyen; Christopher S Kovacs; Jerilynn C Prior; Jacqueline R Center; Suzanne Morin; Robert G Josse; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; John A Eisman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  In which patients does lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) have the largest effect?

Authors:  P Martineau; W D Leslie; H Johansson; N C Harvey; E V McCloskey; D Hans; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Sex- and age-specific associations between income and incident major osteoporotic fractures in Canadian men and women: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  S L Brennan; L Yan; L M Lix; S N Morin; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Ten-year incident osteoporosis-related fractures in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study - comparing site and age-specific risks in women and men.

Authors:  Jerilynn C Prior; Lisa Langsetmo; Brian C Lentle; Claudie Berger; David Goltzman; Christopher S Kovacs; Stephanie M Kaiser; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou; Tassos Anastassiades; Tanveer Towheed; Robert G Josse; Jacques P Brown; William D Leslie; Nancy Kreiger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Temporal trends in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S N Morin; L M Lix; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.

Authors:  L-A Fraser; L Langsetmo; C Berger; G Ioannidis; D Goltzman; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou; R Josse; C S Kovacs; W P Olszynski; T Towheed; D A Hanley; S M Kaiser; J Prior; S Jamal; N Kreiger; J P Brown; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Incidence of hip fractures in Greece during a 30-year period: 1977-2007.

Authors:  G P Lyritis; S Rizou; A Galanos; P Makras
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Geographic variation in osteoporotic hip fracture incidence: the growing importance of asian influences in coming decades.

Authors:  D K Dhanwal; C Cooper; E M Dennison
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-08-02

10.  FRAX provides robust fracture prediction regardless of socioeconomic status.

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.