Daniel Pincus1,2,3, Bheeshma Ravi1,2,4, David Wasserstein1,4, Anjie Huang3, J Michael Paterson2,3, Avery B Nathens1,2,3,4, Hans J Kreder1,2,3,4, Richard J Jenkinson1,3,4, Walter P Wodchis2,3,5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: Although wait times for hip fracture surgery have been linked to mortality and are being used as quality-of-care indicators worldwide, controversy exists about the duration of the wait that leads to complications. Objective: To use population-based wait-time data to identify the optimal time window in which to conduct hip fracture surgery before the risk of complications increases. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based, retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing hip fracture surgery between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2014, at 72 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Risk-adjusted restricted cubic splines modeled the probability of each complication according to wait time. The inflection point (in hours) when complications began to increase was used to define early and delayed surgery. To evaluate the robustness of this definition, outcomes among propensity-score matched early and delayed surgical patients were compared using percent absolute risk differences (RDs, with 95% CIs). Exposure: Time elapsed from hospital arrival to surgery (in hours). Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included a composite of mortality or other medical complications (myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia). Results: Among 42 230 patients with hip fracture (mean [SD] age, 80.1 years [10.7], 70.5% women) who met study entry criteria, overall mortality at 30 days was 7.0%. The risk of complications increased when wait times were greater than 24 hours, irrespective of the complication considered. Compared with 13 731 propensity-score matched patients who received surgery earlier, 13 731 patients who received surgery after 24 hours had a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (898 [6.5%] vs 790 [5.8%]; % absolute RD, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.23-1.35) and the composite outcome (1680 [12.2%]) vs 1383 [10.1%]; % absolute RD, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.43-2.89). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, increased wait time was associated with a greater risk of 30-day mortality and other complications. A wait time of 24 hours may represent a threshold defining higher risk.
Importance: Although wait times for hip fracture surgery have been linked to mortality and are being used as quality-of-care indicators worldwide, controversy exists about the duration of the wait that leads to complications. Objective: To use population-based wait-time data to identify the optimal time window in which to conduct hip fracture surgery before the risk of complications increases. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based, retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing hip fracture surgery between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2014, at 72 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Risk-adjusted restricted cubic splines modeled the probability of each complication according to wait time. The inflection point (in hours) when complications began to increase was used to define early and delayed surgery. To evaluate the robustness of this definition, outcomes among propensity-score matched early and delayed surgical patients were compared using percent absolute risk differences (RDs, with 95% CIs). Exposure: Time elapsed from hospital arrival to surgery (in hours). Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included a composite of mortality or other medical complications (myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia). Results: Among 42 230 patients with hip fracture (mean [SD] age, 80.1 years [10.7], 70.5% women) who met study entry criteria, overall mortality at 30 days was 7.0%. The risk of complications increased when wait times were greater than 24 hours, irrespective of the complication considered. Compared with 13 731 propensity-score matched patients who received surgery earlier, 13 731 patients who received surgery after 24 hours had a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (898 [6.5%] vs 790 [5.8%]; % absolute RD, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.23-1.35) and the composite outcome (1680 [12.2%]) vs 1383 [10.1%]; % absolute RD, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.43-2.89). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, increased wait time was associated with a greater risk of 30-day mortality and other complications. A wait time of 24 hours may represent a threshold defining higher risk.
Authors: Katie J Sheehan; Boris Sobolev; Pierre Guy; Lisa Kuramoto; Suzanne N Morin; Jason M Sutherland; Lauren Beaupre; Donald Griesdale; Michael Dunbar; Eric Bohm; Edward Harvey Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Daniel I McIsaac; Karim Abdulla; Homer Yang; Sudhir Sundaresan; Paula Doering; Sandeep Green Vaswani; Kednapa Thavorn; Alan J Forster Journal: CMAJ Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: W D Leslie; S O'Donnell; C Lagacé; P Walsh; C Bancej; S Jean; K Siminoski; S Kaiser; D L Kendler; S Jaglal Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-10-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Bheeshma Ravi; Richard Jenkinson; Peter C Austin; Ruth Croxford; David Wasserstein; Benjamin Escott; J Michael Paterson; Hans Kreder; Gillian A Hawker Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-05-23
Authors: Boris Sobolev; Pierre Guy; Katie Jane Sheehan; Lisa Kuramoto; Jason M Sutherland; Adrian R Levy; James A Blair; Eric Bohm; Jason D Kim; Edward J Harvey; Suzanne N Morin; Lauren Beaupre; Michael Dunbar; Susan Jaglal; James Waddell Journal: CMAJ Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Antonio De Vincentis; Astrid Ursula Behr; Giuseppe Bellelli; Marco Bravi; Anna Castaldo; Lucia Galluzzo; Giovanni Iolascon; Stefania Maggi; Emilio Martini; Alberto Momoli; Graziano Onder; Marco Paoletta; Luca Pietrogrande; Mauro Roselli; Mauro Ruggeri; Carmelinda Ruggiero; Fabio Santacaterina; Luigi Tritapepe; Amedeo Zurlo; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Mostafa Alabousi; Isabelle D Gauthier; Nicole Li; Gonçalo Mf Dos Santos; Dmitry Golev; Michael N Patlas; Abdullah Alabousi Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2019-06-17
Authors: M-G Gerards; B Haraszti; J Hess; A C D Houpert; P D Idel; F N Klaeren; J Krause; M Coburn Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 1.041