Literature DB >> 25451323

Ten-year incident osteoporosis-related fractures in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study - comparing site and age-specific risks in women and men.

Jerilynn C Prior1, Lisa Langsetmo2, Brian C Lentle3, Claudie Berger2, David Goltzman4, Christopher S Kovacs5, Stephanie M Kaiser6, Jonathan D Adachi7, Alexandra Papaioannou7, Tassos Anastassiades8, Tanveer Towheed8, Robert G Josse9, Jacques P Brown10, William D Leslie11, Nancy Kreiger9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population-based incident fracture data aid fracture prevention and therapy decisions. Our purpose was to describe 10-year site-specific cumulative fracture incidence by sex, age at baseline, and degree of trauma with/without consideration of competing mortality in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study adult cohort.
METHODS: Incident fractures and mortality were identified by annual postal questionnaires to the participant or proxy respondent. Date, site and circumstance of fracture were gathered from structured interviews and medical records. Fracture analyses were stratified by sex and age at baseline and used both Kaplan-Meier and competing mortality methods.
RESULTS: The baseline (1995-97) cohort included 6314 women and 2789 men (aged 25-84 years; mean±SD 62±12 and 59±14, respectively), with 4322 (68%) women and 1732 (62%) men followed to year-10. At least one incident fracture occurred for 930 women (14%) and 247 men (9%). Competing mortality exceeded fracture risk for men aged 65+years at baseline. Age was a strong predictor of incident fractures especially fragility fractures, with higher age gradients for women vs. men. Major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (hip, clinical spine, forearm, humerus) accounted for 41-74% of fracture risk by sex/age strata; in women all MOF sites showed age-related increases but in men only hip was clearly age-related. The most common fractures were the forearm for women and the ribs for men. Hip fracture incidence was the highest for the 75-84 year baseline age-group with no significant difference between women 7.0% (95% CI 5.3, 8.9) and men 7.0% (95% CI 4.4, 10.3).
INTERPRETATION: There are sex differences in the predominant sites and age-gradients of fracture. In older men, competing mortality exceeds cumulative fracture risk.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  10-year fracture incidence; Clinical vertebral fracture; Fracture prediction; Hip fracture; Population-based; Sex

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25451323      PMCID: PMC5092162          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  27 in total

1.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada: an age-period-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Sonia Jean; Siobhan O'Donnell; Claudia Lagacé; Peter Walsh; Christina Bancej; Jacques P Brown; Suzanne Morin; Alexandra Papaioannou; Susan B Jaglal; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Competing mortality and fracture risk assessment.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix; X Wu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  K M Sanders; E Seeman; A M Ugoni; J A Pasco; T J Martin; B Skoric; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effects of sex and age on bone microstructure at the ultradistal radius: a population-based noninvasive in vivo assessment.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; B Lawrence Riggs; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Ann L Oberg; Lisa J McDaniel; Margaret Holets; James M Peterson; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  The use of multiple sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; J A Eisman; S Fujiwara; H Kroger; R Honkanen; L J Melton; T O'Neill; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Non-hip, non-spine fractures drive healthcare utilization following a fracture: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Authors:  G Ioannidis; J Flahive; L Pickard; A Papaioannou; R D Chapurlat; K G Saag; S Silverman; F A Anderson; S H Gehlbach; F H Hooven; S Boonen; J E Compston; C Cooper; A Díez-Perez; S L Greenspan; A Z Lacroix; R Lindsay; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; P N Sambrook; E S Siris; N B Watts; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The impact of incident fractures on health-related quality of life: 5 years of data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; C C Kennedy; G Ioannidis; A Sawka; W M Hopman; L Pickard; J P Brown; R G Josse; S Kaiser; T Anastassiades; D Goltzman; M Papadimitropoulos; A Tenenhouse; J C Prior; W P Olszynski; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  21 in total

1.  Risk of fragility fracture among patients with sarcoidosis: a population-based study 1976-2013.

Authors:  P Ungprasert; C S Crowson; E L Matteson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Association of vertebral endplate microstructure with bone strength in men and women.

Authors:  MeiLissa McKay; Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Ali Guermazi; Jingjiang Liu; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and fracture prediction in patients with spinal cord injuries and disorders.

Authors:  L Abderhalden; F M Weaver; M Bethel; H Demirtas; S Burns; J Svircev; H Hoenig; K Lyles; S Miskevics; L D Carbone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  More-than-minimal-trauma fractures are associated with low bone density: an 8-year prospective study.

Authors:  L Pereira; D Bliuc; P Stanford; J A Eisman; J R Center
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Hearing loss but not bone-regulating hormones predicts fractures in older women-a 17-year follow-up of the Gothenburg BEDA study.

Authors:  A Dotevall; M-L Barrenäs; K Landin-Wilhelmsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The incidence of hip fracture in Shiraz, Iran: a promising rate comparing to previous studies.

Authors:  N Maharlouei; S Atefi; H Namazi; S Kazemifar; M Soveid; H R Shahraki; Z Farahmand; M Khodayari; P Arab; F Forouzan; N Allamehzadeh; S Fazilat; S Khademolhosseini; F Nafari; K B Lankarani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Menstrual and reproductive factors and risk of vertebral fractures in Japanese women: the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective (JPHC) study.

Authors:  Y Shimizu; N Sawada; K Nakamura; Y Watanabe; K Kitamura; M Iwasaki; S Tsugane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  An interpretive descriptive approach of patients with osteoporosis and integrating osteoporosis management advice into their lifestyle.

Authors:  Christina Ziebart; Joy MacDermid; Rochelle Furtado; Tatiana Pontes; Mike Szekeres; Nina Suh; Aliya Khan
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2022-12

9.  Low Osteoporosis Treatment Initiation Rate in Women after Distal Forearm or Proximal Humerus Fracture: A Healthcare Database Nested Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marie Viprey; Pascal Caillet; Guillaume Canat; Susan Jaglal; Julie Haesebaert; Roland Chapurlat; Anne-Marie Schott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Risk factors for hip fracture in very old people: a population-based study.

Authors:  R Wiklund; A Toots; M Conradsson; B Olofsson; H Holmberg; E Rosendahl; Y Gustafson; H Littbrand
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.