Literature DB >> 19802322

Fragile X syndrome: Neural network models of sequencing and memory.

Mina C Johnson-Glenberg1.   

Abstract

A comparative framework of memory processes in males with fragile X syndrome (FXS) and Typically Developing (TYP) mental age-match children is presented. Results indicate a divergence in sequencing skills, such that males with FXS recall sequences similarly to TYP children around five and a half years of age, but eth males with FXS recall significantly worse when compared to TYP children around seven and a half years of age. Performance on one working memory measure, an n-back card task, is modeled with a neural network. To date, no network models explicate the sequencing and memory processes in those with FXS. Noise was added to various levels (weight matrices) in the FXS model and outputs approximated human FXS performance. Three models were compared: 1) FXS; 2) younger mental age-TYP matches; and 3) older reading level-TYP matches. Modeling can help to reify conceptualizations of deficits and to guide in the creation of more valid, science-based remediations. The FXS model suggests that the levels of phonological representation and sequencing in memory are candidates for targeted therapies in males with FXS.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19802322      PMCID: PMC2577566          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Syst Res        ISSN: 1389-0417            Impact factor:   3.523


  46 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability.

Authors:  K R Pugh; W E Mencl; A R Jenner; L Katz; S J Frost; J R Lee; S E Shaywitz; B A Shaywitz
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Modeling language acquisition in atypical phenotypes.

Authors:  Michael S C Thomas; Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Nature of the working memory deficit in fragile-X syndrome.

Authors:  F Munir; K M Cornish; J Wilding
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Genotype, molecular phenotype, and cognitive phenotype: correlations in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  W E Kaufmann; M T Abrams; W Chen; A L Reiss
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-04-02

6.  Cognitive, language and social-cognitive skills of individuals with fragile X syndrome with and without autism.

Authors:  P Lewis; L Abbeduto; M Murphy; E Richmond; N Giles; L Bruno; S Schroeder
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2006-07

7.  The role of the right hippocampus in the recall of spatial location.

Authors:  M L Smith; B Milner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Cognitive profiles associated with the fra(X) syndrome in males and females.

Authors:  L S Freund; A L Reiss
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1991-03-15

Review 9.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia.

Authors:  G E Hinton; T Shallice
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Inadequate cortical feature maps: a neural circuit theory of autism.

Authors:  L Gustafsson
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The importance of considering all attributes of memory in behavioral endophenotyping of mouse models of genetic disease.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  A 'learning platform' approach to outcome measurement in fragile X syndrome: a preliminary psychometric study.

Authors:  S S Hall; J L Hammond; M Hirt; A L Reiss
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2012-04-25

3.  Temporal ordering deficits in female CGG KI mice heterozygous for the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker; Naomi J Goodrich-Hunsaker; Rob Willemsen; Robert F Berman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Language Impairment with a Partial Duplication of DOCK8.

Authors:  Antonio Benítez-Burraco; Maite Fernández-Urquiza; Mª Salud Jiménez-Romero
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2020-12-11

Review 5.  Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  Working memory subsystems and task complexity in young boys with Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  S Baker; S Hooper; M Skinner; D Hatton; J Schaaf; P Ornstein; D Bailey
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2010-12-01

7.  CGG trinucleotide repeat length modulates neural plasticity and spatiotemporal processing in a mouse model of the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker; Kyoungmi Kim; Rob Willemsen; Robert F Berman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Degraded speech sound processing in a rat model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Tracy M Centanni; Kwok W Im; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Reading in Children With Fragile X Syndrome: Phonological Awareness and Feasibility of Intervention.

Authors:  Suzanne M Adlof; Jessica Klusek; Anne Hoffmann; Kerrie L Chitwood; Allison Brazendale; Karen Riley; Leonard J Abbeduto; Jane E Roberts
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2018-05

10.  Reading and phonological skills in boys with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica Klusek; Anna W Hunt; Penny L Mirrett; Deborah D Hatton; Stephen R Hooper; Jane E Roberts; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.