Literature DB >> 22266125

Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Michael R Hunsaker1.   

Abstract

There is a need for refinement of the current behavioral phenotyping methods for mouse models of genetic disorders. The current approach is to perform a behavioral screen using standardized tasks to define a broad phenotype of the model. This phenotype is then compared to what is known concerning the disorder being modeled. The weakness inherent in this approach is twofold: First, the tasks that make up these standard behavioral screens do not model specific behaviors associated with a given genetic mutation but rather phenotypes affected in various genetic disorders; secondly, these behavioral tasks are insufficiently sensitive to identify subtle phenotypes. An alternate phenotyping strategy is to determine the core behavioral phenotypes of the genetic disorder being studied and develop behavioral tasks to evaluate specific hypotheses concerning the behavioral consequences of the genetic mutation. This approach emphasizes direct comparisons between the mouse and human that facilitate the development of neurobehavioral biomarkers or quantitative outcome measures for studies of genetic disorders across species. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22266125      PMCID: PMC3289520          DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  417 in total

1.  Behavioral and neuroanatomical characterization of the Fmr1 knockout mouse.

Authors:  Yann S Mineur; Frans Sluyter; Sanne de Wit; Ben A Oostra; Wim E Crusio
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 2.  Fragile-X syndrome: variability of phenotypic expression.

Authors:  J D Bregman; E Dykens; M Watson; S I Ort; J F Leckman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 8.829

3.  Brain and behaviour in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a volumetric and voxel-based morphometry MRI study.

Authors:  Linda E Campbell; Eileen Daly; Fiona Toal; Angela Stevens; Rayna Azuma; Marco Catani; Virginia Ng; Therese van Amelsvoort; Xavier Chitnis; William Cutter; Declan G M Murphy; Kieran C Murphy
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  FMRP expression as a potential prognostic indicator in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  F Tassone; R J Hagerman; D N Iklé; P N Dyer; M Lampe; R Willemsen; B A Oostra; A K Taylor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-05-28

Review 5.  The molecular genetics of the 22q11-associated schizophrenia.

Authors:  Maria Karayiorgou; Joseph A Gogos
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-20

6.  Anatomical phenotyping in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jacob Ellegood; Laura K Pacey; David R Hampson; Jason P Lerch; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Altered mRNA transport, docking, and protein translation in neurons lacking fragile X mental retardation protein.

Authors:  Der-I Kao; Georgina M Aldridge; Ivan Jeanne Weiler; William T Greenough
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Endophenotypes in the genetic analyses of mental disorders.

Authors:  Tyrone D Cannon; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 18.561

9.  Differential impact of the FMR1 gene on visual processing in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Cary S Kogan; Isabelle Boutet; Kim Cornish; Shahin Zangenehpour; Kathy T Mullen; Jeanette J A Holden; Vazken M Der Kaloustian; Eva Andermann; Avi Chaudhuri
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Altered hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal gland axis regulation in the expanded CGG-repeat mouse model for fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome.

Authors:  J R Brouwer; E Severijnen; F H de Jong; D Hessl; R J Hagerman; B A Oostra; R Willemsen
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 4.905

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The importance of considering all attributes of memory in behavioral endophenotyping of mouse models of genetic disease.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Adaptation of the Arizona Cognitive Task Battery for use with the Ts65Dn mouse model (Mus musculus) of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker; Genevieve K Smith; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Non-restraining EEG Radiotelemetry: Epidural and Deep Intracerebral Stereotaxic EEG Electrode Placement.

Authors:  Anna Papazoglou; Andreas Lundt; Carola Wormuth; Dan Ehninger; Christina Henseler; Julien Soós; Karl Broich; Marco Weiergräber
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Pavlovian contextual and instrumental biconditional discrimination learning in mice.

Authors:  Sarah T Gonzalez; Emma S Welch; Ruth M Colwill
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  CGG trinucleotide repeat length modulates neural plasticity and spatiotemporal processing in a mouse model of the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker; Kyoungmi Kim; Rob Willemsen; Robert F Berman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Reduced activity-dependent protein levels in a mouse model of the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  Ramona E von Leden; Lindsey C Curley; Gian D Greenberg; Michael R Hunsaker; Rob Willemsen; Robert F Berman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Spatiotemporal processing deficits in female CGG KI mice modeling the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  Rachel M Borthwell; Michael R Hunsaker; Rob Willemsen; Robert F Berman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  A systematic-review of olfactory deficits in neurodevelopmental disorders: From mouse to human.

Authors:  Ariel M Lyons-Warren; Isabella Herman; Patrick J Hunt; Benjamin R Arenkiel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 9.052

Review 10.  Neurocognitive endophenotypes in CGG KI and Fmr1 KO mouse models of Fragile X-Associated disorders: an analysis of the state of the field.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.