Literature DB >> 22533667

A 'learning platform' approach to outcome measurement in fragile X syndrome: a preliminary psychometric study.

S S Hall1, J L Hammond, M Hirt, A L Reiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of medications to alleviate the cognitive and behavioural symptoms of individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS) are now underway. However, there are few reliable, valid and/or sensitive outcome measures available that can be directly administered to individuals with FXS. The majority of assessments employed in clinical trials may be suboptimal for individuals with intellectual disability (ID) because they require face-to-face interaction with an examiner, taxing administration periods, and do not provide reinforcement and/or feedback during the test. We therefore examined the psychometric properties of a new computerised 'learning platform' approach to outcome measurement in FXS.
METHOD: A brief computerised test, incorporated into the Discrete Trial Trainer©- a commercially available software program designed for children with ID - was administered to 13 girls with FXS, 12 boys with FXS and 15 matched ID controls aged 10 to 23 years (mental age = 4 to 12 years). The software delivered automated contingent access to reinforcement, feedback, token delivery and prompting procedures (if necessary) on each trial to facilitate responding. The primary outcome measure was the participant's learning rate, derived from the participant's cumulative record of correct responses.
RESULTS: All participants were able to complete the test and floor effects appeared to be minimal. Learning rates averaged approximately five correct responses per minute, ranging from one to eight correct responses per minute in each group. Test-retest reliability of the learning rates was 0.77 for girls with FXS, 0.90 for boys with FXS and 0.90 for matched ID controls. Concurrent validity with raw scores obtained on the Arithmetic subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III was 0.35 for girls with FXS, 0.80 for boys with FXS and 0.56 for matched ID controls. The learning rates were also highly sensitive to change, with effect sizes of 1.21, 0.89 and 1.47 in each group respectively following 15 to 20, 15-min sessions of intensive discrete trial training conducted over 1.5 days.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a learning platform approach to outcome measurement could provide investigators with a reliable, valid and highly sensitive measure to evaluate treatment efficacy, not only for individuals with FXS but also for individuals with other ID.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22533667      PMCID: PMC3417081          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01560.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res        ISSN: 0964-2633


  48 in total

1.  Variables related to differences in standardized test outcomes for children with autism.

Authors:  L K Koegel; R L Koegel; A Smith
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1997-06

Review 2.  Fragile X syndrome: assessment and treatment implications.

Authors:  Allan L Reiss; Scott S Hall
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am       Date:  2007-07

3.  Open-label riluzole in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Craig A Erickson; Ning Weng; Ivan Jeanne Weiler; William T Greenough; Kimberly A Stigler; Logan K Wink; Christopher J McDougle
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Synaptic regulation of protein synthesis and the fragile X protein.

Authors:  W T Greenough; A Y Klintsova; S A Irwin; R Galvez; K E Bates; I J Weiler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Side effects of minocycline treatment in patients with fragile X syndrome and exploration of outcome measures.

Authors:  Agustini Utari; Weerasak Chonchaiya; Susan M Rivera; Andrea Schneider; Randi J Hagerman; Sultana M H Faradz; Iryna M Ethell; Danh V Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2010-09

6.  Age-associated cognitive deficits in humans and dogs: a comparative neuropsychological approach.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Michelle Ryan; Vivian Kulaga; Christie McShane; Lori-Ann Christie; Morris Freedman; Norton William Milgram
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.067

7.  ADHD symptoms in children with FXS.

Authors:  Kelly Sullivan; Deborah Hatton; Julie Hammer; John Sideris; Stephen Hooper; Peter Ornstein; Donald Bailey
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Contrast detection in infants with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  F Farzin; D Whitney; R J Hagerman; S M Rivera
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Fragile X syndrome: Neural network models of sequencing and memory.

Authors:  Mina C Johnson-Glenberg
Journal:  Cogn Syst Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.523

10.  A solution to limitations of cognitive testing in children with intellectual disabilities: the case of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  David Hessl; Danh V Nguyen; Cherie Green; Alyssa Chavez; Flora Tassone; Randi J Hagerman; Damla Senturk; Andrea Schneider; Amy Lightbody; Allan L Reiss; Scott Hall
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  7 in total

1.  Using discrete trial training to identify specific learning impairments in boys with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Scott S Hall; Kristin M Hustyi; Jennifer L Hammond; Melissa Hirt; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-07

2.  Standardized Assessment Accommodations for Individuals with Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Talia Thompson; Jeanine M Coleman; Karen Riley; Laurel A Snider; Londi J Howard; Stephanie M Sansone; David Hessl
Journal:  Contemp Sch Psychol       Date:  2018-01-23

Review 3.  Public Health Literature Review of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Anne C Wheeler; Catharine Riley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Outcome measures for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; David Hessl; Leonard Abbeduto; Allan L Reiss; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; Tiina K Urv
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.225

5.  Identifying large-scale brain networks in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Scott S Hall; Heidi Jiang; Allan L Reiss; Michael D Greicius
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 6.  Updated report on tools to measure outcomes of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Dejan B Budimirovic; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Craig A Erickson; Scott S Hall; David Hessl; Allan L Reiss; Margaret K King; Leonard Abbeduto; Walter E Kaufmann
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Trialing targeted therapies for autism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 53.440

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.