Literature DB >> 22642882

The importance of considering all attributes of memory in behavioral endophenotyping of mouse models of genetic disease.

Michael R Hunsaker1.   

Abstract

In order to overcome difficulties in evaluating cognitive function in mouse models of genetic disorders, it is critical to take into account the background strain of the mouse and reported phenotypes in the clinical population being studied. Recent studies have evaluated cognitive function across a number of background strains and found that spatial memory assayed by the water maze and contextual fear conditioning often does not provide optimal results. The logical extension to these results is to emphasize not only spatial, but all attributes or domains of memory function in behavioral phenotyping experiments. A careful evaluation of spatial, temporal, sensory/perceptual, affective, response, executive, proto-linguistic, and social behaviors designed to specifically evaluate the cognitive function each mouse model can be performed in a rapid, relatively high throughput manner. Such results would not only provide a more comprehensive snapshot of brain function in mouse disease models than the more common approach that approaches nonspecific spatial memory tasks to evaluate cognition, but also would better model the disorders being studied.
© 2012 American Psychological Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642882      PMCID: PMC3367383          DOI: 10.1037/a0028453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  93 in total

Review 1.  An analysis of independence and interactions of brain substrates that subserve multiple attributes, memory systems, and underlying processes.

Authors:  Raymond P Kesner; Jason Rogers
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  Mechanisms of neural and behavioral dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Daniel W Wesson; Ralph A Nixon; Efrat Levy; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Beyond spatial memory: the anterior thalamus and memory for the temporal order of a sequence of odor cues.

Authors:  Mathieu Wolff; Sheree J Gibb; John C Dalrymple-Alford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 5.  Clues to the foundations of numerical cognitive impairments: evidence from genetic disorders.

Authors:  Tony J Simon
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Decreased fragile X mental retardation protein expression underlies amygdala dysfunction in carriers of the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  David Hessl; John M Wang; Andrea Schneider; Kami Koldewyn; Lien Le; Christine Iwahashi; Katherine Cheung; Flora Tassone; Paul J Hagerman; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 7.  Hippocampal NMDA receptors and anxiety: at the interface between cognition and emotion.

Authors:  Christopher Barkus; Stephen B McHugh; Rolf Sprengel; Peter H Seeburg; J Nicholas P Rawlins; David M Bannerman
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Low-level neonatal thimerosal exposure: further evaluation of altered neurotoxic potential in SJL mice.

Authors:  Robert F Berman; Isaac N Pessah; Peter R Mouton; Deepak Mav; Jean Harry
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Neurotoxic effects of postnatal thimerosal are mouse strain dependent.

Authors:  M Hornig; D Chian; W I Lipkin
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Reduced Hippocampal Activation During Recall is Associated with Elevated FMR1 mRNA and Psychiatric Symptoms in Men with the Fragile X Premutation.

Authors:  Kami Koldewyn; David Hessl; John Adams; Flora Tassone; Paul J Hagerman; Randi J Hagerman; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.978

View more
  3 in total

1.  Adaptation of the Arizona Cognitive Task Battery for use with the Ts65Dn mouse model (Mus musculus) of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker; Genevieve K Smith; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 2.  Neurocognitive endophenotypes in CGG KI and Fmr1 KO mouse models of Fragile X-Associated disorders: an analysis of the state of the field.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-12-27

3.  mNos2 deletion and human NOS2 replacement in Alzheimer disease models.

Authors:  Carol A Colton; Joan G Wilson; Angela Everhart; Donna M Wilcock; Jukka Puoliväli; Taneli Heikkinen; Juho Oksman; Olli Jääskeläinen; Kimmo Lehtimäki; Teemu Laitinen; Nina Vartiainen; Michael P Vitek
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.685

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.