BACKGROUND: The formation of fusion genes plays roles in both oncogenesis and evolution by facilitating the acquisition of novel functions. Here we describe the first example of a human polymorphic in-frame fusion of two unrelated genes associated with a copy number variant. DESIGN AND METHODS: Array comparative genomic hybridization was used to identify cryptic oncogenic fusion genes. Fusion gene structure and origin was examined using molecular biological and computational methods. Phenotype associations were examined using PopGen cohorts. RESULTS: Targeted array comparative genomic hybridization to identify cryptic oncogenic fusion genes in patients with atypical myeloproliferative neoplasms identified a 111 kb amplification with breakpoints within the TRK-fused gene (TFG, a target of translocations in lymphoma and thyroid tumors) and G-protein-coupled receptor 128 (GPR128) resulting in an expressed in-frame TFG-GPR128 fusion transcript. The fusion gene was also identified in healthy individuals at a frequency of 0.02 (3/120). Normally both genes are in identical orientations with TFG immediately downstream of GPR128. In individuals with a copy number variant amplification, one or two copies of the TFG-GPR128 fusion are found between the two parental genes. The breakpoints share a region of microhomology, and haplotype and microsatellite analysis indicate a single ancestral origin. Analysis of PopGen cohorts showed no obvious phenotype association. An in silico search of EST databases found no other copy number variant amplification-associated fusion transcripts, suggesting that this is an uncommon event. Conclusions The finding of a polymorphic gene fusion in healthy individuals adds another layer to the complexity of human genome variation and emphasizes the importance of careful discrimination of oncogenic changes found in tumor samples from non-pathogenic normal variation.
BACKGROUND: The formation of fusion genes plays roles in both oncogenesis and evolution by facilitating the acquisition of novel functions. Here we describe the first example of a human polymorphic in-frame fusion of two unrelated genes associated with a copy number variant. DESIGN AND METHODS: Array comparative genomic hybridization was used to identify cryptic oncogenic fusion genes. Fusion gene structure and origin was examined using molecular biological and computational methods. Phenotype associations were examined using PopGen cohorts. RESULTS: Targeted array comparative genomic hybridization to identify cryptic oncogenic fusion genes in patients with atypical myeloproliferative neoplasms identified a 111 kb amplification with breakpoints within the TRK-fused gene (TFG, a target of translocations in lymphoma and thyroid tumors) and G-protein-coupled receptor 128 (GPR128) resulting in an expressed in-frame TFG-GPR128 fusion transcript. The fusion gene was also identified in healthy individuals at a frequency of 0.02 (3/120). Normally both genes are in identical orientations with TFG immediately downstream of GPR128. In individuals with a copy number variant amplification, one or two copies of the TFG-GPR128 fusion are found between the two parental genes. The breakpoints share a region of microhomology, and haplotype and microsatellite analysis indicate a single ancestral origin. Analysis of PopGen cohorts showed no obvious phenotype association. An in silico search of EST databases found no other copy number variant amplification-associated fusion transcripts, suggesting that this is an uncommon event. Conclusions The finding of a polymorphic gene fusion in healthy individuals adds another layer to the complexity of human genome variation and emphasizes the importance of careful discrimination of oncogenic changes found in tumor samples from non-pathogenic normal variation.
Authors: L Hernández; M Pinyol; S Hernández; S Beà; K Pulford; A Rosenwald; L Lamant; B Falini; G Ott; D Y Mason; G Delsol; E Campo Journal: Blood Date: 1999-11-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jan Cools; Daniel J DeAngelo; Jason Gotlib; Elizabeth H Stover; Robert D Legare; Jorges Cortes; Jeffrey Kutok; Jennifer Clark; Ilene Galinsky; James D Griffin; Nicholas C P Cross; Ayalew Tefferi; James Malone; Rafeul Alam; Stanley L Schrier; Janet Schmid; Michal Rose; Peter Vandenberghe; Gregor Verhoef; Marc Boogaerts; Iwona Wlodarska; Hagop Kantarjian; Peter Marynen; Steven E Coutre; Richard Stone; D Gary Gilliland Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Luis Hernández; Sílvia Beà; Beatriz Bellosillo; Magda Pinyol; Brunangelo Falini; Antonino Carbone; German Ott; Andreas Rosenwald; Alberto Fernández; Karen Pulford; David Mason; Stephan W Morris; Eugenio Santos; Elias Campo Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Zubair M Ahmed; Saber Masmoudi; Ersan Kalay; Inna A Belyantseva; Mohamed Ali Mosrati; Rob W J Collin; Saima Riazuddin; Mounira Hmani-Aifa; Hanka Venselaar; Mayya N Kawar; Abdelaziz Tlili; Bert van der Zwaag; Shahid Y Khan; Leila Ayadi; S Amer Riazuddin; Robert J Morell; Andrew J Griffith; Ilhem Charfedine; Refik Caylan; Jaap Oostrik; Ahmet Karaguzel; Abdelmonem Ghorbel; Sheikh Riazuddin; Thomas B Friedman; Hammadi Ayadi; Hannie Kremer Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-10-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Thomas Ernst; Andrew Chase; Katerina Zoi; Katherine Waghorn; Claire Hidalgo-Curtis; Joannah Score; Amy Jones; Francis Grand; Andreas Reiter; Andreas Hochhaus; Nicholas C P Cross Journal: Haematologica Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: H Lilljebjörn; H Ågerstam; C Orsmark-Pietras; M Rissler; H Ehrencrona; L Nilsson; J Richter; T Fioretos Journal: Leukemia Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Moneeb A K Othman; Beata Grygalewicz; Barbara Pienkowska-Grela; Martina Rincic; Katharina Rittscher; Joana B Melo; Isabel M Carreira; Britta Meyer; Watek Marzena; Thomas Liehr Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 2.479