BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of tyrosine kinases, caused by either mutation or gene fusion, is of major importance for the development of many hematologic malignancies, particularly myeloproliferative neoplasms. We hypothesized that hitherto unrecognized, cytogenetically cryptic tyrosine kinase fusions may be common in non-classical or atypical myeloproliferative neoplasms and related myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. DESIGN AND METHODS: To detect genomic copy number changes associated with such fusions, we performed a systematic search in 68 patients using custom designed, targeted, high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization. Arrays contained 44,000 oligonucleotide probes that targeted 500 genes including all 90 tyrosine kinases plus downstream tyrosine kinase signaling components, other translocation targets, transcription factors, and other factors known to be important for myelopoiesis. RESULTS: No abnormalities involving tyrosine kinases were detected; however, nine cytogenetically cryptic copy number imbalances were detected in seven patients, including hemizygous deletions of RUNX1 or CEBPA in two cases with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. Mutation analysis of the remaining alleles revealed non-mutated RUNX1 and a frameshift insertion within CEBPA. A further mutation screen of 187 patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms identified RUNX1 mutations in 27 (14%) and CEBPA mutations in seven (4%) patients. Analysis of other transcription factors known to be frequently mutated in acute myeloid leukemia revealed NPM1 mutations in six (3%) and WT1 mutations in two (1%) patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Univariate analysis indicated that patients with mutations had a shorter overall survival (28 versus 44 months, P=0.019) compared with patients without mutations, with the prognosis for cases with CEBPA, NPM1 or WT1 mutations being particularly poor. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that mutations of transcription and other nuclear factors are frequent in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms and are generally mutually exclusive. CEBPA, NPM1 or WT1 mutations may be associated with a poor prognosis, an observation that will need to be confirmed by detailed prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of tyrosine kinases, caused by either mutation or gene fusion, is of major importance for the development of many hematologic malignancies, particularly myeloproliferative neoplasms. We hypothesized that hitherto unrecognized, cytogenetically cryptic tyrosine kinase fusions may be common in non-classical or atypical myeloproliferative neoplasms and related myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. DESIGN AND METHODS: To detect genomic copy number changes associated with such fusions, we performed a systematic search in 68 patients using custom designed, targeted, high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization. Arrays contained 44,000 oligonucleotide probes that targeted 500 genes including all 90 tyrosine kinases plus downstream tyrosine kinase signaling components, other translocation targets, transcription factors, and other factors known to be important for myelopoiesis. RESULTS: No abnormalities involving tyrosine kinases were detected; however, nine cytogenetically cryptic copy number imbalances were detected in seven patients, including hemizygous deletions of RUNX1 or CEBPA in two cases with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. Mutation analysis of the remaining alleles revealed non-mutated RUNX1 and a frameshift insertion within CEBPA. A further mutation screen of 187 patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms identified RUNX1 mutations in 27 (14%) and CEBPA mutations in seven (4%) patients. Analysis of other transcription factors known to be frequently mutated in acute myeloid leukemia revealed NPM1 mutations in six (3%) and WT1 mutations in two (1%) patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Univariate analysis indicated that patients with mutations had a shorter overall survival (28 versus 44 months, P=0.019) compared with patients without mutations, with the prognosis for cases with CEBPA, NPM1 or WT1 mutations being particularly poor. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that mutations of transcription and other nuclear factors are frequent in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms and are generally mutually exclusive. CEBPA, NPM1 or WT1 mutations may be associated with a poor prognosis, an observation that will need to be confirmed by detailed prospective studies.
Authors: C Preudhomme; D Warot-Loze; C Roumier; N Grardel-Duflos; R Garand; J L Lai; N Dastugue; E Macintyre; C Denis; F Bauters; J P Kerckaert; A Cosson; P Fenaux Journal: Blood Date: 2000-10-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A John Iafrate; Lars Feuk; Miguel N Rivera; Marc L Listewnik; Patricia K Donahoe; Ying Qi; Stephen W Scherer; Charles Lee Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: C Graux; J Cools; C Melotte; H Quentmeier; A Ferrando; R Levine; J R Vermeesch; M Stul; B Dutta; N Boeckx; A Bosly; P Heimann; A Uyttebroeck; N Mentens; R Somers; R A F MacLeod; H G Drexler; A T Look; D G Gilliland; L Michaux; P Vandenberghe; I Wlodarska; Peter Marynen; Anne Hagemeijer Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2004-09-12 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: T H Tahirov; T Inoue-Bungo; H Morii; A Fujikawa; M Sasaki; K Kimura; M Shiina; K Sato; T Kumasaka; M Yamamoto; S Ishii; K Ogata Journal: Cell Date: 2001-03-09 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jan Cools; Daniel J DeAngelo; Jason Gotlib; Elizabeth H Stover; Robert D Legare; Jorges Cortes; Jeffrey Kutok; Jennifer Clark; Ilene Galinsky; James D Griffin; Nicholas C P Cross; Ayalew Tefferi; James Malone; Rafeul Alam; Stanley L Schrier; Janet Schmid; Michal Rose; Peter Vandenberghe; Gregor Verhoef; Marc Boogaerts; Iwona Wlodarska; Hagop Kantarjian; Peter Marynen; Steven E Coutre; Richard Stone; D Gary Gilliland Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Kaeferstein; U Krug; J Tiesmeier; M Aivado; M Faulhaber; M Stadler; J Krauter; U Germing; W K Hofmann; H P Koeffler; A Ganser; W Verbeek Journal: Leukemia Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Sanjay S Patel; Caleb Ho; Ryan N Ptashkin; Sam Sadigh; Adam Bagg; Julia T Geyer; Mina L Xu; Thomas Prebet; Emily F Mason; Adam C Seegmiller; Elizabeth A Morgan; David P Steensma; Eric S Winer; Waihay J Wong; Robert P Hasserjian; Olga K Weinberg Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-05-14
Authors: Jason Brayer; Jeffrey E Lancet; John Powers; Alan List; Lodovico Balducci; Rami Komrokji; Javier Pinilla-Ibarz Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2015-05-03 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Rocco Piazza; Simona Valletta; Nils Winkelmann; Sara Redaelli; Roberta Spinelli; Alessandra Pirola; Laura Antolini; Luca Mologni; Carla Donadoni; Elli Papaemmanuil; Susanne Schnittger; Dong-Wook Kim; Jacqueline Boultwood; Fabio Rossi; Giuseppe Gaipa; Greta P De Martini; Paola Francia di Celle; Hyun Gyung Jang; Valeria Fantin; Graham R Bignell; Vera Magistroni; Torsten Haferlach; Enrico Maria Pogliani; Peter J Campbell; Andrew J Chase; William J Tapper; Nicholas C P Cross; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-12-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: M Schmidt; J Rinke; V Schäfer; S Schnittger; A Kohlmann; E Obstfelder; C Kunert; J Ziermann; N Winkelmann; E Eigendorff; T Haferlach; C Haferlach; A Hochhaus; T Ernst Journal: Leukemia Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: M Sakurai; H Kunimoto; N Watanabe; Y Fukuchi; S Yuasa; S Yamazaki; T Nishimura; K Sadahira; K Fukuda; H Okano; H Nakauchi; Y Morita; I Matsumura; K Kudo; E Ito; Y Ebihara; K Tsuji; Y Harada; H Harada; S Okamoto; H Nakajima Journal: Leukemia Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 11.528