Literature DB >> 19793879

Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight.

Gavin Buckingham1, Jonathan S Cant, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

The visual properties of an object provide many cues as to the tensile strength, compliance, and density of the material from which it is made. However, it is not well understood how these implicit associations affect our perceptions of these properties and how they determine the initial forces that are applied when an object is picked up. Here we examine the effects of these cues on such forces by using the classic "material-weight illusion" (MWI). Grip and load forces were measured in three experiments as participants lifted cubes made from metal, wood, and expanded polystyrene. These cubes were adjusted to have a different mass than would be expected for a particular material. For the initial lifts, the forces were scaled to the expected weight of each object, such that the metal block was gripped and lifted with more force than the polystyrene one. After a few lifts, however, participants scaled their forces to the actual weight of the blocks, implicitly disregarding the misleading visual cues to each block's composition (experiments 1 and 2). Despite this rapid rescaling, participants experienced a robust MWI throughout the duration of the experiments. In fact, the grip and load forces never matched the perception of weight until the differences in the visual surface properties between the blocks were removed (experiment 3). These findings are discussed in relation to recent debates about the underlying causes of weight-based illusions and the effect of top-down visual cues on perception and action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19793879     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00515.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  49 in total

1.  Perceiving and acting upon weight illusions in the absence of somatosensory information.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Elizabeth Evgenia Michelakakis; Jonathan Cole
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Anticipatory scaling of grip forces when lifting objects of everyday life.

Authors:  Joachim Hermsdörfer; Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Sandra Eidenmüller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Probabilistic information on object weight shapes force dynamics in a grip-lift task.

Authors:  Leif Trampenau; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; Thilo van Eimeren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

5.  No kidding: low back pain and type of container influence adolescents' perception of load heaviness.

Authors:  Thierry Nicolet; Anne F Mannion; Paul Heini; Christine Cedraschi; Federico Balagué
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Representation of the material properties of objects in the visual cortex of nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Naokazu Goda; Atsumichi Tachibana; Gouki Okazawa; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Distinct contributions of explicit and implicit memory processes to weight prediction when lifting objects and judging their weights: an aging study.

Authors:  Kevin M Trewartha; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cognitive attribution of the source of an error in object-lifting results in differences in motor generalization.

Authors:  Kelene Fercho; Lee A Baugh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.