Literature DB >> 27212895

Understanding Genomic Knowledge in Rural Appalachia: The West Virginia Genome Community Project.

Jennifer A Mallow1, Laurie A Theeke2, Patricia Crawford3, Elizabeth Prendergast4, Chuck Conner5, Tony Richards5, Barbara McKown5, Donna Bush6, Donald Reed5, Meagan E Stabler7, Jianjun Zhang4, Geri Dino8, Taura L Barr9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rural communities have limited knowledge about genetics and genomics and are also underrepresented in genomic education initiatives. The purpose of this project was to assess genomic and epigenetic knowledge and beliefs in rural West Virginia. SAMPLE: A total of 93 participants from three communities participated in focus groups and 68 participants completed a demographic survey. The age of the respondents ranged from 21 to 81 years. Most respondents had a household income of less than $40,000, were female and most were married, completed at least a HS/GED or some college education working either part-time or full-time.
METHOD: A Community Based Participatory Research process with focus groups and demographic questionnaires was used.
FINDINGS: Most participants had a basic understanding of genetics and epigenetics, but not genomics. Participants reported not knowing much of their family history and that their elders did not discuss such information. If the conversations occurred, it was only during times of crisis or an illness event. Mental health and substance abuse are topics that are not discussed with family in this rural population.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the efforts surrounding genetic/genomic understanding have focused on urban populations. This project is the first of its kind in West Virginia and has begun to lay the much needed infrastructure for developing educational initiatives and extending genomic research projects into our rural Appalachian communities. By empowering the public with education, regarding the influential role genetics, genomics, and epigenetics have on their health, we can begin to tackle the complex task of initiating behavior changes that will promote the health and well-being of individuals, families and communities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community Based Participatory Research; Focus groups; Genetics; Genomics; Rural

Year:  2016        PMID: 27212895      PMCID: PMC4871272          DOI: 10.14574/ojrnhc.v16i1.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Online J Rural Nurs Health Care        ISSN: 1539-3399


  22 in total

1.  Community-based participatory research: implications for public health funding.

Authors:  Meredith Minkler; Angela Glover Blackwell; Mildred Thompson; Heather Tamir
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Educating underserved Latino communities about family health history using lay health advisors.

Authors:  K A Kaphingst; C R Lachance; A Gepp; L Hoyt D'Anna; B Rios-Ellis
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  The contribution of qualitative research to the development of tailor-made community-based interventions in primary care: a review.

Authors:  Yvonne J F M Jansen; Marleen M E Foets; Antoinette A de Bont
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

Authors:  J Kitzinger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-29

5.  Current and emerging technology approaches in genomics.

Authors:  Yvette P Conley; Leslie G Biesecker; Stephen Gonsalves; Carrie J Merkle; Maggie Kirk; Bradley E Aouizerat
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.176

6.  Age differences in genetic knowledge, health literacy and causal beliefs for health conditions.

Authors:  S Ashida; M Goodman; C Pandya; L M Koehly; C Lachance; J Stafford; K A Kaphingst
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  A grand challenge: providing benefits of clinical genetics to those in need.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Information seeking and intentions to have genetic testing for hereditary cancers in rural and Appalachian Kentuckians.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; James E Andrews; Donald O Case; Suzanne L Allard; J David Johnson
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  A blueprint for genomic nursing science.

Authors:  Kathleen A Calzone; Jean Jenkins; Alexis D Bakos; Ann K Cashion; Nancy Donaldson; W Gregory Feero; Suzanne Feetham; Patricia A Grady; Ada Sue Hinshaw; Ann R Knebel; Nellie Robinson; Mary E Ropka; Diane Seibert; Kathleen R Stevens; Lois A Tully; Jo Ann Webb
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.176

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  How does the genomic naive public perceive whole genomic testing for health purposes? A scoping review.

Authors:  Isabella A Sherburn; Keri Finlay; Stephanie Best
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 5.351

2.  Factors Predicting Participation in the Prospective Genomic Sequencing Study, Total Cancer Care (TCC), in Kentucky.

Authors:  McKayla J Riggs; Bin Huang; Quan Chen; Therese Bocklage; Marissa R Schuh; Ming Poi; John L Villano; Michael J Cavnar; Susanne M Arnold; Rachel W Miller; Frederick R Ueland; Jill M Kolesar
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.667

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.