BACKGROUND: To determine whether Texas primary care physicians' attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics changed over a five-year period, a follow-up survey was conducted and the results obtained in 1996 were compared with those obtained in 2001. METHODS: A survey was mailed in 2001 to a random sample of 350 primary care physicians in Texas. RESULTS: More primary care physicians in 2001 were discussing the subject of genetic screening with their patients and more physicians were referring their patients for genetic evaluations and testing for cancer risk, compared with 1996. Cost of genetic testing continues to be the most frequently cited barrier to using genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Results suggest a continuing need for more educational programs for physicians regarding genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
BACKGROUND: To determine whether Texas primary care physicians' attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics changed over a five-year period, a follow-up survey was conducted and the results obtained in 1996 were compared with those obtained in 2001. METHODS: A survey was mailed in 2001 to a random sample of 350 primary care physicians in Texas. RESULTS: More primary care physicians in 2001 were discussing the subject of genetic screening with their patients and more physicians were referring their patients for genetic evaluations and testing for cancer risk, compared with 1996. Cost of genetic testing continues to be the most frequently cited barrier to using genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Results suggest a continuing need for more educational programs for physicians regarding genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
Authors: Sean M Blaine; June C Carroll; Andrea L Rideout; Gord Glendon; Wendy Meschino; Cheryl Shuman; Deanna Telner; Natasha Van Iderstine; Joanne Permaul Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Kimberly M Kelly; Margaret M Love; Kevin A Pearce; Kyle Porter; Mary A Barron; Michael Andrykowski Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Nan M Solomons; Amanda E Lamb; Frances L Lucas; Eileen F McDonald; Susan Miesfeldt Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: R P McKillip; B A Borden; P Galecki; S A Ham; L Patrick-Miller; J P Hall; S Hussain; K Danahey; M Siegler; M J Sorrentino; Y Sacro; A M Davis; D T Rubin; K Lipstreuer; T S Polonsky; R Nanda; W R Harper; J L Koyner; D L Burnet; W M Stadler; M J Ratain; D O Meltzer; P H O'Donnell Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Lois C Friedman; Gregory R Harper; Wendy S Rubinstein; June A Peters; David T Mauger Journal: Genet Med Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Barbara A Bernhardt; Cara Zayac; Erynn S Gordon; Lisa Wawak; Reed E Pyeritz; Sarah E Gollust Journal: Per Med Date: 2012-09-01 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Gregory R Harper; Lois C Friedman; Wendy S Rubinstein; David T Mauger Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-07-28 Impact factor: 56.272