Literature DB >> 24980785

Opinions, hopes and concerns regarding pharmacogenomics: a comparison of healthy individuals, heart failure patients and heart transplant recipients.

K Lachance1, S Korol1, E O'Meara2, A Ducharme2, N Racine2, M Liszkowski2, J L Rouleau2, G B Pelletier2, M Carrier2, M White2, S de Denus1.   

Abstract

It is not yet known whether healthy individuals and patients with a chronic disease have similar attitudes towards pharmacogenomics. Thus we conducted a survey of 175 healthy volunteers, 175 heart failure (HF) patients and 100 heart transplant recipients to compare their opinions on this subject. Most participants (>90%) stated that they would accept pharmacogenomic testing and expressed high hopes regarding its potential applications. Overall, interest for pharmacogenomics was shared equally among the three groups. In contrast, after adjusting for age, gender, education and income, healthy individuals were more likely to voice concerns about potential employment (P=0.008 vs HF, odds ratio (OR)=2.93, confidence interval (CI)=1.33-6.47; P=0.010 vs Transplant, OR=2.46, CI=1.24-4.90) and insurance discrimination (P=0.001 vs HF, OR=5.58, CI=2.01-15.48; P<0.001 vs Transplant, OR=4.98, CI=2.03-12.21) and were possibly more worried by confidentiality issues. These findings highlight the need for strict legislation and proper educational strategies directed at the general population to facilitate the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980785     DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2014.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J        ISSN: 1470-269X            Impact factor:   3.550


  44 in total

1.  The growing burden of chronic disease in America.

Authors:  Gerard Anderson; Jane Horvath
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations.

Authors:  Diana S Catz; Nancy S Green; Jonathan N Tobin; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; Ann Umemoto; Jennifer Cernoch; Roxane Brown; Fredericka Wolman
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2005

3.  There is no decision to make: experiences and attitudes toward treatment-focused genetic testing among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B Meiser; M Gleeson; N Kasparian; K Barlow-Stewart; M Ryan; K Watts; D Menon; G Mitchell; K Tucker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Public perspectives about pharmacogenetic testing and managing ancillary findings.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Genevieve Tindall; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-02

Review 5.  Genetic tailoring of pharmacotherapy in heart failure: optimize the old, while we wait for something new.

Authors:  Jasmine A Talameh; Howard L McLeod; Kirkwood F Adams; J Herbert Patterson
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; W Burke; G S Ginsburg; R Mills; R Agans
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Public interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to heart disease and cancer: a population-based survey in the UK.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Martin J Jarvis; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Factors influencing uptake of pharmacogenetic testing in a diverse patient population.

Authors:  J O'Daniel; J Lucas; P Deverka; D Ermentrout; G Silvey; D F Lobach; S B Haga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  A Community's Awareness and Perceptions of Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  S Hahn; S Letvak; K Powell; C Christianson; D Wallace; M Speer; P Lietz; S Blanton; J Vance; M Pericak-Vance; V C Henrich
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults: estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010.

Authors:  Brian W Ward; Jeannine S Schiller
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of patient perceptions of genomic testing to inform pharmacogenomic implementation.

Authors:  Yee Ming Lee; Ryan P McKillip; Brittany A Borden; Catherine E Klammer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Patient Perceptions of Care as Influenced by a Large Institutional Pharmacogenomic Implementation Program.

Authors:  R P McKillip; B A Borden; P Galecki; S A Ham; L Patrick-Miller; J P Hall; S Hussain; K Danahey; M Siegler; M J Sorrentino; Y Sacro; A M Davis; D T Rubin; K Lipstreuer; T S Polonsky; R Nanda; W R Harper; J L Koyner; D L Burnet; W M Stadler; M J Ratain; D O Meltzer; P H O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Attitudes toward pharmacogenetics in patients undergoing CYP2C19 testing following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Grace Lee; Lisa A Varughese; Laura Conway; Carol Stojinski; Sandhya Ashokkumar; Karen Monono; William Matthai; Daniel M Kolansky; Jay Giri; Sony Tuteja
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Patients' Perceptions of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Access to Their Results: State of the Art in Spain and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pablo Zubiaur; David Nicolás Prósper-Cuesta; Jesús Novalbos; Gina Mejía-Abril; Marcos Navares-Gómez; Gonzalo Villapalos-García; Paula Soria-Chacartegui; Francisco Abad-Santos
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.