Literature DB >> 34911350

Understanding the barriers and enablers of pharmacogenomic testing in primary care: a qualitative systematic review with meta-aggregation synthesis.

Sadaf Qureshi1, Asam Latif2, Laura Condon3, Ralph K Akyea3, Joe Kai3, Nadeem Qureshi3.   

Abstract

Introduction: Pharmacogenomic testing can indicate which drugs may have limited therapeutic action or lead to adverse effects, hence guiding rational and safe prescribing. However, in the UK and other countries, there are still significant barriers to implementation of testing in primary care. Objective: This systematic review presents the barriers and enablers to the implementation of pharmacogenomics in primary care setting. Materials & methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were searched through to July 2020 for studies that reported primary qualitative data of primary care professionals and patient views. Following screening, data extraction and quality assessment, data synthesis was undertaken using meta-aggregation based on the theoretical domain's framework (TDF). Confidence in the synthesized findings relating to credibility and dependability was established using CONQual. Eligible papers were categorized into six TDF domains - knowledge; social and professional roles; behavioral regulation; beliefs and consequences; environmental context and resources; and social influences.
Results: From 1669 citations, eighteen eligible studies were identified across seven countries, with a sample size of 504 participants including both primary care professionals and patients. From the data, 15 synthesized statements, all with moderate CONQual rating emerged. These categories range from knowledge, awareness among Primary Care Physicians and patients, professional relationships, negative impact of PGx, belief that PGx can reduce adverse drug reactions, clinical evidence, cost-effectiveness, informatics, reporting issues and social issues.
Conclusion: Through use of TDF, fifteen synthesized statements provide policymakers with valuable recommendations for the implementation of pharmacogenomics in primary care. In preparation, policymakers need to consider the introduction of effective educational strategies for both PCPs and patients to raise knowledge, awareness, and engagement. The actual introduction of PGx will require reorganization with decision support tools to aid use of PGx in primary care, with a clear delegation of roles and responsibilities between general professionals and pharmacists supplemented by a local pool of experts. Furthermore, policy makers need to address the cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics and having appropriate infrastructure supporting testing and interpretation including informatic solutions for utilizing pharmacogenomic results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barriers; enablers; implementation; meta-aggregation; pharmacogenomic testing; primary care; qualitative systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34911350      PMCID: PMC8759425          DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.638


  51 in total

Review 1.  Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics (U-PGx): The Time for Implementation is Now. An Horizon2020 Program to Drive Pharmacogenomics into Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Erika Cecchin; Rossana Roncato; Hendrik J Guchelaar; Giuseppe Toffoli
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.837

2.  A pilot study of the implementation of pharmacogenomic pharmacist initiated pre-emptive testing in primary care.

Authors:  Paul C D Bank; Jesse J Swen; Rowena D Schaap; Daniëlle B Klootwijk; Renée Baak-Pablo; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics for Personalized Precision Medicine: Barriers and Solutions.

Authors:  Michelle E Klein; Md Masud Parvez; Jae-Gook Shin
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Clinical Decision Support and Primary Care Acceptance of Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Dian A Chase; Sherry Baron; Joan S Ash
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

Review 5.  Research Directions in the Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics: An Overview of US Programs and Projects.

Authors:  Simona Volpi; Carol J Bult; Rex L Chisholm; Patricia A Deverka; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Howard J Jacob; Melpomeni Kasapi; Howard L McLeod; Dan M Roden; Marc S Williams; Eric D Green; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Samuel Aronson; Larisa H Cavallari; Joshua C Denny; Lynn G Dressler; Julie A Johnson; Teri E Klein; J Steven Leeder; Micheline Piquette-Miller; Minoli Perera; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Heidi L Rehm; Marylyn D Ritchie; Todd C Skaar; Nikhil Wagle; Richard Weinshilboum; Kristin W Weitzel; Robert Wildin; John Wilson; Teri A Manolio; Mary V Relling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Implementing pharmacogenetic testing in rural primary care practices: a pilot feasibility study.

Authors:  Lynn G Dressler; Gillian C Bell; Pearl M Abernathy; Karl Ruch; Sheri Denslow
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.533

7.  Primary Care Providers' Interest in Using a Genetic Test to Guide Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment.

Authors:  Emily C Williams; Jessica P Young; Carol E Achtmeyer; Christian S Hendershot
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2016-07-30

8.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.

Authors:  James Cane; Denise O'Connor; Susan Michie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Assessing the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Panel-Testing in Primary Care in the Netherlands Utilizing a Theoretical Framework.

Authors:  Cathelijne H van der Wouden; Ellen Paasman; Martina Teichert; Matty R Crone; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Jesse J Swen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Pharmacogenomics for Primary Care: An Overview.

Authors:  Victoria Rollinson; Richard Turner; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.