PURPOSE: Standardization of care is essential for improving outcome of kidney transplantation (KT). Clinical pathways (CPs) are known to standardize and improve perioperative care for a number of interventions. In transplantation medicine, however, pertinent evidence is very limited. This study evaluates effects of a CP on quality of care in KT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=32) undergoing KT between July 2006 and August 2007 who were treated with a CP were compared to patients (n=44) treated without CP between January 2005 and June 2006. Several quality indicators regarding process and outcome were compared between groups. RESULTS: Quality of care was significantly higher in the CP group for the following indicators: timely removal of central venous catheters, wound drains, and Foley catheters and control of cyclosporine levels, respiratory exercising, and pain control. Median stay decreased non-significantly from 21.4 to 18.3 days. There was significantly less delayed graft function in the CP group. All other outcome indicators showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a CP for KT improves the quality of perioperative treatment by standardizing care. Regarding effects on outcome, no clear conclusion can be drawn. We recommend that large randomized studies are conducted to evaluate the latter issue.
PURPOSE: Standardization of care is essential for improving outcome of kidney transplantation (KT). Clinical pathways (CPs) are known to standardize and improve perioperative care for a number of interventions. In transplantation medicine, however, pertinent evidence is very limited. This study evaluates effects of a CP on quality of care in KT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=32) undergoing KT between July 2006 and August 2007 who were treated with a CP were compared to patients (n=44) treated without CP between January 2005 and June 2006. Several quality indicators regarding process and outcome were compared between groups. RESULTS: Quality of care was significantly higher in the CP group for the following indicators: timely removal of central venous catheters, wound drains, and Foley catheters and control of cyclosporine levels, respiratory exercising, and pain control. Median stay decreased non-significantly from 21.4 to 18.3 days. There was significantly less delayed graft function in the CP group. All other outcome indicators showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a CP for KT improves the quality of perioperative treatment by standardizing care. Regarding effects on outcome, no clear conclusion can be drawn. We recommend that large randomized studies are conducted to evaluate the latter issue.
Authors: David A Axelrod; Mary K Guidinger; Keith P McCullough; Alan B Leichtman; Jeffrey D Punch; Robert M Merion Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Richard J Howard; Ian R Jamieson; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Georg R Linke; Markus Mieth; Stefan Hofer; Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke; Jürgen Weitz; Eike Martin; Markus W Büchler Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Patrick Téoule; Laura Römling; Matthias Schwarzbach; Emrullah Birgin; Felix Rückert; Torsten J Wilhelm; Marco Niedergethmann; Stefan Post; Nuh N Rahbari; Christoph Reißfelder; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 2.423