Literature DB >> 24337422

[Requirements for the organization of pain therapy in hospitals: interdepartmental comparison for pain management from the employees' perspective].

J Erlenwein1, G Ufer, A Hecke, M Pfingsten, M Bauer, F Petzke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the focus of pain management in hospitals was the organization and quality of control of postoperative pain, although there is a similar demand in nonsurgical departments. The aim of this study was to assess the employees' perspective on problems and corresponding solutions in pain management in a university hospital and to further clarify whether the implementation of concepts and tools of pain management across disciplines is feasible.
METHODS: Physicians and nursing staff of all inpatient departments of the University Hospital Göttingen were asked about problems in pain management and the importance of various established instruments using a standardized questionnaire. Ratings were recorded on a numeric rating scale (0-10). The analysis was primarily descriptive, the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were used when appropriate.
RESULTS: In all, 149 medical and 501 nursing employees were included. The quality of pain management was perceived as better in surgical departments than in the conservative and pediatric departments. In all areas, the lack of an adequate order for baseline- and rescue-analgesic, and accordingly the nursing staff's limited ability to act was rated as problematic. In contrast to the conservative and pediatric departments, the predominant problem of surgical departments was the lack of availability of physicians on the ward. As a solution, the advice provided by pain consultation services was rated highly by the staff in all areas. The importance of implementation of standardized analgesic concepts was also supported equally in all areas. The evaluation of the quality of pain management was related to the employee's estimation of their ability to actively treat pain. Physicians rated problems in quality and organization lower compared to nursing stuff.
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that from the employee's perspective problems in pain management in surgical and nonsurgical departments are very similar. Transferring concepts and structures of surgical pain management, such as standardized concepts and advice and or care through pain services, would meet high levels of acceptance. The results also indicate that the nursing staff's ability to treat should be increased by the provision of adequate rescue-analgesics. To close deficits in the management of care, established concepts of pain management could be extended to all departments of a hospital. Similarities outweigh differences in the employee's assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337422     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-013-1375-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  31 in total

1.  The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries.

Authors:  Alison E Powell; Huw T O Davies
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Improving outcomes: focus on workplace issues.

Authors:  Ellen H Elpern; Michael R Silver
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  [Implementation of a standardized perioperative pain management concept in three hospitals of a consortium].

Authors:  P Saur; U Junker; P Gaus; H Haeske-Seeberg; C Blöchle; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  The effect of education, assessment and a standardised prescription on postoperative pain management. The value of clinical audit in the establishment of acute pain services.

Authors:  M Harmer; K A Davies
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  [Quality of postoperative pain therapy in Austria: national survey of all departments of anesthesiology].

Authors:  C Kinstner; R Likar; A Sandner-Kiesling; D Hutschala; W Pipam; B Gustorff
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Pain prevalence in hospitalized patients in a German university teaching hospital.

Authors:  Barbara Strohbuecker; Herbert Mayer; George C M Evers; Rainer Sabatowski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 7.  [Quality control in multimodal postoperative therapy].

Authors:  E Pogatzki; G Brodner; H Van Aken
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  [Cross-sectional field 14 pain medicine. Implementation of the German Pain Society (DGSS) core curriculum in the model study course MaReCuM].

Authors:  M Dusch; J Benrath; J Fischer; M Schmelz; H Fritz; H Klüter; M Thiel; R D Treede
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 9.  Inpatient treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Thomas G K Breuer; Juris J Meier
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 10.  Assessment and management of acute pain in adult medical inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Helfand; Michele Freeman
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.750

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].

Authors:  R Likar; W Jaksch; T Aigmüller; M Brunner; T Cohnert; J Dieber; W Eisner; S Geyrhofer; G Grögl; F Herbst; R Hetterle; F Javorsky; H G Kress; O Kwasny; S Madersbacher; H Mächler; R Mittermair; J Osterbrink; B Stöckl; M Sulzbacher; B Taxer; B Todoroff; A Tuchmann; A Wicker; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  [Delegation of medical activities in acute pain therapy].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; A Moroder; E Biermann; F Petzke; A P F Ehlers; H Bitter; E Pogatzki-Zahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Pain management in departments of internal medicine : Results of a national survey on structures and processes of care].

Authors:  M I Emons; T H Scheeper-von der Born; F Petzke; V Ellenrieder; L Reinhardt; W Meißner; J Erlenwein
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 1.107

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.