Literature DB >> 3045356

The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

A Donabedian1.   

Abstract

Before assessment can begin we must decide how quality is to be defined and that depends on whether one assesses only the performance of practitioners or also the contributions of patients and of the health care system; on how broadly health and responsibility for health are defined; on whether the maximally effective or optimally effective care is sought; and on whether individual or social preferences define the optimum. We also need detailed information about the causal linkages among the structural attributes of the settings in which care occurs, the processes of care, and the outcomes of care. Specifying the components or outcomes of care to be sampled, formulating the appropriate criteria and standards, and obtaining the necessary information are the steps that follow. Though we know much about assessing quality, much remains to be known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3045356     DOI: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  1259 in total

1.  Process models for telehealth: an industrial approach to quality management of distant medical practice.

Authors:  H Kangarloo; J D Dionisio; U Sinha; D Johnson; R K Taira
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain.

Authors:  W E van der Weide; J H Verbeek; F J van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Evaluation research in occupational health services: general principles and a systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  C T Hulshof; J H Verbeek; F J van Dijk; W E van der Weide; I T Braam
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care.

Authors:  S A Buetow; M Roland
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

5.  Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record.

Authors:  C Björvell; I Thorell-Ekstrand; R Wredling
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

Review 6.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

7.  New Zealand and United Kingdom experiences with the RAND modified Delphi approach to producing angina and heart failure criteria for quality assessment in general practice.

Authors:  S A Buetow; G D Coster
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

8.  Setting up a quality assurance programme at the medical emergency department of a university hospital: promises and limitations.

Authors:  J B Wasserfallen; O Moeschler; B Yersin
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2001

9.  Appropriate time frames for data collection in quality of life research among cancer patients at the end of life.

Authors:  Siew Tzuh Tang; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Putting continuous quality improvement into accreditation: improving approaches to quality assessment.

Authors:  E Scrivens
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.