Literature DB >> 23135771

[Process optimization by central control of acute pain therapy: implementation of standardized treatment concepts and central pain management in hospitals].

J Erlenwein1, D Stüder, J-P Lange, M Bauer, F Petzke, M Przemeck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigation was to describe the effects of standardization and central control of the processes involved in postoperative pain management from patient and employee perspectives.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 282/307) and respective hospital staff (n = 149/119) evaluated the processes, the quality of postoperative pain management and result parameters 3 months before and 12 months after the introduction of standardization of the postoperative pain therapy process using a set of standardized questionnaires.
RESULTS: Pain level and the waiting period for an analgesic partially decreased and a higher subjective effectiveness of medication was achieved in patients after the standardization. Patients felt that the pain was taken more seriously and contacted the staff for additional medication more frequently. From an employee viewpoint the quality of care and individual competence and ability to treat pain increased after the introduction of standardization. Pain assessment was improved and employees rated their knowledge and education level as higher than before the intervention. Patients with pre-existing chronic pain and patients with special regional therapy benefited only partially after the introduction and an increase in pain intensity was even observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of care was improved by standardization of the postoperative pain management. The legal and practical ability of the nursing stuff to administer pain medication within well-defined margins reduced the dependence on the ward doctor and at the same time patient pain levels. Patients received analgesics more quickly and experienced increased effectiveness. These results should be an incentive to reconsider the importance of the organization of postoperative pain management, because the quality of care with all potential medical and economic advantages, can be easily optimized by such simple mechanisms. They also show that the quality assessment of acute pain and the selection of appropriate indicators need further development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23135771     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-012-2095-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  30 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Improving outcomes: focus on workplace issues.

Authors:  Ellen H Elpern; Michael R Silver
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  [Implementation of a standardized perioperative pain management concept in three hospitals of a consortium].

Authors:  P Saur; U Junker; P Gaus; H Haeske-Seeberg; C Blöchle; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Effects of a clinical pathway on quality of care in kidney transplantation: a non-randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Matthias Schwarzbach; Roderich Bönninghoff; Katrin Harrer; Johannes Weiss; Christof Denz; Peter Schnülle; Rainer Birck; Stefan Post; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  The physical and psychological experience of pain: the effects of labeling and cold pressor temperature on three pain measures in college women.

Authors:  Michele S Hirsch; Robert M Liebert
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Assessment of postoperative pain--need for action!

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Jørgen B Dahl
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  [Postoperative pain relief is an important factor for the patients' selection of a clinic. Results of an anonymous survey].

Authors:  C Simanski; R Lefering; T Paffrath; P Riess; N Yücel; M Maegele; C Thüsing; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Is patient satisfaction a legitimate outcome of pain management?

Authors:  John Carlson; Richard Youngblood; Jo Ann Dalton; William Blau; Celeste Lindley
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management.

Authors:  T H Gould; D L Crosby; M Harmer; S M Lloyd; J N Lunn; G A Rees; D E Roberts; J A Webster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-14
View more
  9 in total

1.  [Requirements for the organization of pain therapy in hospitals: interdepartmental comparison for pain management from the employees' perspective].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; G Ufer; A Hecke; M Pfingsten; M Bauer; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  [Delegation of medical activities in acute pain therapy].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; A Moroder; E Biermann; F Petzke; A P F Ehlers; H Bitter; E Pogatzki-Zahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Management of patients with chronic pain in acute and perioperative medicine : An interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M Pfingsten; M Hüppe; D Seeger; A Kästner; R Graner; F Petzke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Standardized treatment protocols in acute postoperative pain therapy: analysis of contents of standardized medicinal concepts].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M Emons; A Hecke; N Nestler; S Wirz; M Bauer; W Meißner; F Petzke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Process control in acute pain management. An analysis of the degree of organization of applied standard protocols].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M I Emons; A Hecke; N Nestler; M Przemeck; M Bauer; W Meißner; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  [Pre-existing pain as comorbidity in postoperative acute pain service].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; J Schlink; M Pfingsten; J Hinz; M Bauer; M Quintel; F Petzke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Clinical relevance of persistent postoperative pain after total hip replacement - a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Joachim Erlenwein; Martin Müller; Deborah Falla; Michael Przemeck; Michael Pfingsten; Stefan Budde; Michael Quintel; Frank Petzke
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  The effectiveness of an oral opioid rescue medication algorithm for postoperative pain management compared to PCIA : A cohort analysis.

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M I Emons; F Petzke; M Quintel; I Staboulidou; M Przemeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [Critical incidents in acute pain management-A risk analysis of CIRS reports].

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M Maring; M I Emons; H J Gerbershagen; R M Waeschle; L Saager; F Petzke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 1.052

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.