Literature DB >> 19760472

Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: is there a difference?

Robert B Bourne1, Bert Chesworth, Aileen Davis, Nizar Mahomed, Kory Charron.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Both primary total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty relieve pain, restore function, and increase mobility. Despite these successes, there is controversy as to whether THA or TKA provides greater or similar improvement. We therefore compared primary THA and TKA patient results in terms of (1) willingness to have surgery again; (2) WOMAC change score; (3) whether expectations were met; and (4) satisfaction. Patients undergoing primary THA were more willing to undergo their surgery again (THA 96%, TKA 89%), demonstrated greater WOMAC change scores, more frequently reported their expectations were met (THA 78%, TKA 70%), and expressed greater overall satisfaction (THA 89%, TKA 81%). In addition, patients undergoing THA expressed higher satisfaction with pain reduction while performing activities (ie, walking, stairs, and sitting/lying) and their ability to perform daily activities (ie, stairs, transportation, getting up, lying in bed, and light domestic duties) when compared with patients undergoing TKA. Our data suggest primary THA offers superior short-term outcomes when compared with primary TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760472      PMCID: PMC2806999          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1046-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

1.  Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement.

Authors:  J M Quintana; A Escobar; A Bilbao; I Arostegui; I Lafuente; I Vidaurreta
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery.

Authors:  Bert M Chesworth; Nizar N Mahomed; Robert B Bourne; Aileen M Davis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The Southwestern Ontario Joint Replacement Pilot Project: electronic point-of-care data collection. Southwestern Ontario Study Group.

Authors:  R B Bourne; W J Sibbald; G Doig; L Lee; S Adolph; D Robertson; M Provencher
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement.

Authors:  A Escobar; J M Quintana; A Bilbao; I Aróstegui; I Lafuente; I Vidaurreta
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery.

Authors:  P R Fortin; A E Clarke; L Joseph; M H Liang; M Tanzer; D Ferland; C Phillips; A J Partridge; P Bélisle; A H Fossel; N Mahomed; C B Sledge; J N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-08

7.  The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Jones; D C Voaklander; D W Johnston; M E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-02-12

8.  Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75.

Authors:  J G Anderson; R L Wixson; D Tsai; S D Stulberg; R W Chang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup.

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Lipalo Mokete; Jeff Guerin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  A Laupacis; R Bourne; C Rorabeck; D Feeny; C Wong; P Tugwell; K Leslie; R Bullas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  60 in total

1.  Improvement of activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  [Objectifying results in total knee arthroplasty: Is "patient satisfaction" adequate].

Authors:  C Kopkow; J Schmitt; E Haase; T Lange; K-P Günther; J Lützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Native rotational knee kinematics are lost in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty when the tibial component is replaced.

Authors:  Daisuke Hamada; Keizo Wada; Tomoya Takasago; Tomohiro Goto; Akihiro Nitta; Kosaku Higashino; Yoshihiro Fukui; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Open-label milnacipran for patients with persistent knee pain 1 year or longer after total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  David M Marks; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2013-07-11

5.  Higher patient knowledge and resilience improve the functional outcome of primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander Bumberger; Katharina Borst; Gerhard M Hobusch; Madeleine Willegger; David Stelzeneder; Reinhard Windhager; Stephan Domayer; Wenzel Waldstein
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Characterizing patients' expectations in hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Frederique J Hafkamp; Paul Lodder; Jolanda de Vries; Taco Gosens; Brenda L den Oudsten
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Shinya Kawahara; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Pre-operative arthritis severity as a predictor for total knee arthroplasty patients' satisfaction.

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Maike Jarrous; Isabell Güdden; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Model-based evaluation of cost-effectiveness of nerve growth factor inhibitors in knee osteoarthritis: impact of drug cost, toxicity, and means of administration.

Authors:  E Losina; G Michl; J E Collins; D J Hunter; J M Jordan; E Yelin; A D Paltiel; J N Katz
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Patient expectations and satisfaction in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective two-year outcome study.

Authors:  Christopher L Blum; Eric Lepkowsky; Adil Hussein; Edgar A Wakelin; Christopher Plaskos; Jan A Koenig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.