Literature DB >> 17052924

Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement.

A Escobar1, J M Quintana, A Bilbao, I Aróstegui, I Lafuente, I Vidaurreta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study responsiveness and establish the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and minimal detectable change (MDC) in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).
METHODS: Prospective observational study in three public hospitals of all consecutive patients on waiting lists to undergo TKR intervention with diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients were asked to complete before the intervention and at 6 months and 2 years afterward the SF-36 and the WOMAC health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQoL), and additional transition questions which measured the changes in their joint at 6 months. In both questionnaires the possible range of values is from 0 to 100 points.
RESULTS: In WOMAC improvement at 6 months after a TKR was between 27 (stiffness) and 31 points (pain). The SF-36 showed improvements between the 28.3 points of role physical and 2.79 of general health. From 6 months to 2 years, WOMAC improvements were between 2 and 6 points. The MCID ranged from 14.52 (stiffness) to 22.87 (pain) on the WOMAC and in the physical domains of SF-36 from 11.56 (physical function) to 16.86 (bodily pain). On the WOMAC, the MDC ranged from 13.11 (function) to 29.12 (stiffness), and on SF-36 from 19.50 (physical function) to 41.23 (social functioning).
CONCLUSIONS: The MCID for TKR is around 15 on WOMAC, while with the SF-36 of at least 10 points. These values should not be considered as absolute thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17052924     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  135 in total

1.  Effects of glucosamine and chondroitin supplementation on knee osteoarthritis: an analysis with marginal structural models.

Authors:  Shibing Yang; Charles B Eaton; Timothy E McAlindon; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 10.995

2.  Comparison of the short form-12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire with the SF-36 in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have replacement surgery.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Validity and Responsiveness of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: A Comparative Study Among Total Knee Replacement Patients.

Authors:  Barbara Gandek; John E Ware
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Reasons for functional decline despite reductions in knee pain: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  Daniel K White; David T Felson; Jingbo Niu; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Tuhina Neogi
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-14

5.  Evaluation of opioid use among patients with back disorders and arthritis.

Authors:  Corey J Hayes; Nalin Payakachat; Chenghui Li
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Physical activity and experience of total knee replacement in patients one to four years postsurgery in the dominican republic: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Derek S Stenquist; Scott A Elman; Aileen M Davis; Laura M Bogart; Sarah A Brownlee; Edward S Sanchez; Adianez Santiago; Roya Ghazinouri; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Do Pain Coping and Pain Beliefs Associate With Outcome Measures Before Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Catastrophize About Pain? A Cross-sectional Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Mark P Jensen; Dennis Ang; James Slover; Robert Perera; Levent Dumenci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Open Versus Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Kyle R Duchman; David E DeMik; Bastian Uribe; Brian R Wolf; Matthew Bollier
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

9.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Herng-Chia Chiu; Yih-Huei Uen; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes.

Authors:  Patricia D Franklin; Wenjun Li; David C Ayers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.