Literature DB >> 34283279

Patient expectations and satisfaction in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective two-year outcome study.

Christopher L Blum1, Eric Lepkowsky1, Adil Hussein2, Edgar A Wakelin3, Christopher Plaskos4, Jan A Koenig5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The impact of fulfillment of patient expectations throughout recovery on satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not well understood. Utilizing a standardized TKA method with a robotically assisted (RA) platform, we investigated the impact of expectation fulfillment at 3-month (M) and 6-M on 1-year (Y) and 2-Y satisfaction. We hypothesize that early fulfillment of patient expectations is associated with improved midterm patient satisfaction. We also compare improvements in outcomes with RA-TKA to those of a recent large national TKA cohort study to determine whether RA-TKA meets or exceeds the current standard of care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred six patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent robotic-assisted TKA by a single surgeon using the OMNIBotics system. Patients completed KOOS and New Knee Society Score (KSS) preoperatively and at 3M, 6M, 1Y, and 2Y postoperatively. Expectation fulfillment was subdivided into patients who were below or above the average expectation score pre-operatively, or fulfillment of expectation score at 3M and 6M post TKA. The satisfaction of each group was then compared at 1Y and 2Y post TKA. Study cohort outcomes were compared to contemporary literature from the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR) database.
RESULTS: Patients with greater than average KSS expectation fulfillment at 3M reported significantly higher KSS satisfaction scores at 1Y (34.9 ± 5.3 vs 30.6 ± 6.7, p = 0.0012), and patients with greater than average 6M expectation fulfillment reported improved satisfaction at 1Y (33.9 ± 5.9 vs 31.1 ± 6.7, p = 0.0330) and 2Y (35.2 ± 4.8 vs 32.4 ± 6.8, p = 0.0323). When compared to the FORCE-TJR database, no significant differences in post-operative KOOS outcomes were observed except for Sports and Recreation, for which the RAS group demonstrated higher scores (65.5 ± 30.0 vs 53.0 ± 27.1 p < 0.0001); however, the study cohort reported significantly greater improvements in KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Sports and Recreation, and Quality of Life at multiple time points up to 2 years post TKA.
CONCLUSION: High early-expectation fulfillment was associated with improved satisfaction at 1Y and 2Y, indicating the importance of managing patient-specific post-operative care to ensure patients reach their pre-operative goals. Greater improvements in all KOOS sub-scores and in absolute Sports and Recreation at 1Y and 2Y were observed in this robotic-assisted cohort compared to a large contemporary database, indicating that RAS meets or exceeds current standard of care benchmarks for patient-reported outcomes.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expectation fulfillment; Patient outcomes; Patient satisfaction; Robot-assisted TKA; TKA

Year:  2021        PMID: 34283279     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04067-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  27 in total

1.  BoneMorphing versus freehand localization of anatomical landmarks: consequences for the reproducibility of implant positioning in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathalie Perrin; Eric Stindel; Christian Roux
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov

Review 2.  Early Outcomes of Kinematic Alignment in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  P Maxwell Courtney; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  A comparison of classical and anatomical total knee alignment methods in robotic total knee arthroplasty: classical and anatomical knee alignment methods in TKA.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Yim; Eun-Kyoo Song; Mohammad Shahnawaz Khan; Zhen Hui Sun; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Rajitha Gunaratne; Dylan N Pratt; Joseph Banda; Daniel P Fick; Riaz J K Khan; Brett W Robertson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Erratum to: In Brief: Gustilo-Anderson Classification.

Authors:  Paul H Kim; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Thomas S Thornhill; Benjamin N Rome; John Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Improved Patient Satisfaction following Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Austin F Smith; Christian J Eccles; Samrath J Bhimani; Kevin M Denehy; Rohat B Bhimani; Langan S Smith; Arthur L Malkani
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden.

Authors:  O Robertsson; M Dunbar; T Pehrsson; K Knutson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-06

9.  Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: is there a difference?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert Chesworth; Aileen Davis; Nizar Mahomed; Kory Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain.

Authors:  Andrew G Kim; Zachary Bernhard; Alexander J Acuña; Victoria S Wu; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 2.  Is it prime time for robotic-assisted TKAs? A systematic review of current studies.

Authors:  Arun B Mullaji; Ahmed A Khalifa
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-08

Review 3.  The evolution of robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty, each system must be assessed for its own value: a systematic review of clinical evidence and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannes Vermue; Cécile Batailler; Paul Monk; Fares Haddad; Thomas Luyckx; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Comparison of patient reported outcomes after robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty in the same patient undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Praharsha Mulpur; A B Suhas Masilamani; Mrinal Prakash; Adarsh Annapareddy; Kushal Hippalgaonkar; A V Gurava Reddy
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment - A prospective randomized and multicenter study.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Xin Chen; Xiaoquan Wang; Bo Zhang; Wei Wang; Yu Fan; Jun Yan; Xiaofeng Zhang; Yu Zhao; Yuan Lin; Jun Liu; Jin Lin
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.