Literature DB >> 16154777

Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement.

J M Quintana1, A Escobar, A Bilbao, I Arostegui, I Lafuente, I Vidaurreta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study responsiveness and establish the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC) in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in three public hospitals of all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis (OA) on waiting lists to undergo THR. Patients completed the SF-36 and the WOMAC (subscales transformed to 0 to 100), which measured the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), before intervention and 6 months and 2 years later, and additional transitional questions, which measured the changes in the joint 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Improvements at 6 months after a THR were between 37 (stiffness) and 39 points (pain), depending on the WOMAC domain. The SF-36 domains also showed improvements: physical function (31.91), physical role (33.71), and bodily pain (29.77). From 6 months to 2 years, improvements ranged from 2 to 5 points, except for role physical (13.25). A ceiling effect was detected on some WOMAC domains as well as a floor effect on the SF-36. The MCID ranged from 25.91 (stiffness) to 29.26 (pain) on the WOMAC and from 10.78 (physical role) to 20.40 (physical function) on the SF-36. The MDC ranged from 21.38 (pain) to 27.98 (stiffness) on the WOMAC and from 18.99 (physical function) to 42.05 (social function) on the SF-36.
CONCLUSIONS: These values indicate expected gains after THR. However, the MCID and MDC values must be viewed cautiously due to the uncertainty of these estimators and should not be considered as absolute thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16154777     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  62 in total

1.  Clinically meaningful change estimates for the six-minute walk test and daily activity in individuals with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Michael J Shoemaker; Amy B Curtis; Eric Vangsnes; Michael G Dickinson
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2013-09

2.  The SF36 Version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Richard H Osborne; Anne Taylor; Jan Sansoni
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Improvement of activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Deborah A Marshall; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Jasvinder Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Norman A Johanson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Lih-Wen Mau; Je-Ken Chang; Jun-Wen Wang; Herng-Chia Chiu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Inge H F Reininga; Wiebren Zijlstra; Robert Wagenmakers; Alexander L Boerboom; Bregtje P Huijbers; Johan W Groothoff; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Je-Ken Chang; Chi-Yin Wong; Jun-Wen Wang; Yuan-Kun Tu; Herng-Chia Chiu; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: is there a difference?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert Chesworth; Aileen Davis; Nizar Mahomed; Kory Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Women demonstrate more pain and worse function before THA but comparable results 12 months after surgery.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Franco M Impellizzeri; Florian D Naal; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.