Literature DB >> 23236204

Untangling perceptual memory: hysteresis and adaptation map into separate cortical networks.

Caspar M Schwiedrzik1, Christian C Ruff, Andreea Lazar, Frauke C Leitner, Wolf Singer, Lucia Melloni.   

Abstract

Perception is an active inferential process in which prior knowledge is combined with sensory input, the result of which determines the contents of awareness. Accordingly, previous experience is known to help the brain "decide" what to perceive. However, a critical aspect that has not been addressed is that previous experience can exert 2 opposing effects on perception: An attractive effect, sensitizing the brain to perceive the same again (hysteresis), or a repulsive effect, making it more likely to perceive something else (adaptation). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and modeling to elucidate how the brain entertains these 2 opposing processes, and what determines the direction of such experience-dependent perceptual effects. We found that although affecting our perception concurrently, hysteresis and adaptation map into distinct cortical networks: a widespread network of higher-order visual and fronto-parietal areas was involved in perceptual stabilization, while adaptation was confined to early visual areas. This areal and hierarchical segregation may explain how the brain maintains the balance between exploiting redundancies and staying sensitive to new information. We provide a Bayesian model that accounts for the coexistence of hysteresis and adaptation by separating their causes into 2 distinct terms: Hysteresis alters the prior, whereas adaptation changes the sensory evidence (the likelihood function).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian model; adaptation; functional magnetic resonance imaging; hysteresis; perceptual memory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23236204      PMCID: PMC3977616          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  75 in total

Review 1.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation.

Authors:  James A Hanley; Abdissa Negassa; Michael D deB Edwardes; Janet E Forrester
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Detection of eye movements from fMRI data.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Temporal characteristics of binocular rivalry: visual field asymmetries.

Authors:  Xiangchuan Chen; Sheng He
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli.

Authors:  Xiangchuan Chen; Sheng He
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The neurophysiological time pattern of illusionary visual perceptual transitions: a simultaneous EEG and fMRI study.

Authors:  Thomas J Müller; Andrea Federspiel; Helge Horn; Karl Lövblad; Christoph Lehmann; Thomas Dierks; Werner K Strik
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Repetition-induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Jean-Pierre Changeux; Lionel Naccache; Jérôme Sackur; Claire Sergent
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Human brain activity related to orientation discrimination tasks.

Authors:  G A Orban; P Dupont; R Vogels; G Bormans; L Mortelmans
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Emily H Trittschuh; Jim M Monti; M Marsel Mesulam; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  25 in total

1.  A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Different time scales of motion integration for anticipatory smooth pursuit and perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Elena Potapchuk; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Probabilistic Representation in Human Visual Cortex Reflects Uncertainty in Serial Decisions.

Authors:  Ruben S van Bergen; Janneke F M Jehee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Positive hysteresis in emotion recognition: Face processing visual regions are involved in perceptual persistence, which mediates interactions between anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Andreia Verdade; Teresa Sousa; João Castelhano; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  Rule-based and stimulus-based cues bias auditory decisions via different computational and physiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Nathan Tardiff; Lalitta Suriya-Arunroj; Yale E Cohen; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 7.  The Certainty of Ambiguity in Visual Neural Representations.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 7.745

Review 8.  Toward a computational theory of conscious processing.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Lucie Charles; Jean-Rémi King; Sébastien Marti
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  How previous experience shapes perception in different sensory modalities.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Caspar M Schwiedrzik; A Davi Vitela; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Hysteresis as an implicit prior in tactile spatial decision making.

Authors:  Sabrina D Thiel; Sebastian Bitzer; Till Nierhaus; Christian Kalberlah; Sven Preusser; Jane Neumann; Vadim V Nikulin; Elke van der Meer; Arno Villringer; Burkhard Pleger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.