Yong Jae Han1, Jae Myung Cha2, Jae Hyun Park1, Jung Won Jeon1, Hyun Phil Shin1, Kwang Ro Joo1, Joung Il Lee1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 149 Sangil-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 149 Sangil-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-727, Republic of Korea. drcha@khu.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rebleeding and mortality rates remain high in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. AIM: To identify clinical and endoscopic risk factors for rebleeding and mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: This study was performed in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding who underwent upper endoscopic procedures between July 2006 and February 2013. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics were compared among patients with and without rebleeding and mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for rebleeding and mortality. RESULTS: After excluding 64 patients, data for 689 patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding were analyzed. Peptic ulcer (62.6 %) was by far the most common source of bleeding. Endoscopic intervention was performed within 24 h in 99.0 % of patients, and successful endoscopic hemostasis was possible in 80.7 % of patients. The 30-day rebleeding rate was 13.1 % (n = 93). Unsuccessful endoscopic hemostasis was found to be the only independent risk factor for rebleeding (odds ratio 79.6; 95 % confidence interval 37.8-167.6; p = 0.000). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 3.2 % (n = 23). Unsuccessful endoscopic hemostasis (odds ratio 4.9; 95 % confidence interval 1.7-13.9; p = 0.003) was also associated with increased 30-day mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Successful endoscopic hemostasis is an independent protective factor for both rebleeding and mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
BACKGROUND: Rebleeding and mortality rates remain high in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. AIM: To identify clinical and endoscopic risk factors for rebleeding and mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: This study was performed in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding who underwent upper endoscopic procedures between July 2006 and February 2013. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics were compared among patients with and without rebleeding and mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for rebleeding and mortality. RESULTS: After excluding 64 patients, data for 689 patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding were analyzed. Peptic ulcer (62.6 %) was by far the most common source of bleeding. Endoscopic intervention was performed within 24 h in 99.0 % of patients, and successful endoscopic hemostasis was possible in 80.7 % of patients. The 30-day rebleeding rate was 13.1 % (n = 93). Unsuccessful endoscopic hemostasis was found to be the only independent risk factor for rebleeding (odds ratio 79.6; 95 % confidence interval 37.8-167.6; p = 0.000). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 3.2 % (n = 23). Unsuccessful endoscopic hemostasis (odds ratio 4.9; 95 % confidence interval 1.7-13.9; p = 0.003) was also associated with increased 30-day mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Successful endoscopic hemostasis is an independent protective factor for both rebleeding and mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Authors: Angel Lanas; Maria Angeles Perez-Aisa; Faust Feu; Julio Ponce; Esteban Saperas; Santos Santolaria; Luis Rodrigo; Joaquim Balanzo; Eduardo Bajador; Pedro Almela; Jose M Navarro; Fernando Carballo; Manuel Castro; Enrique Quintero Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: V Jairath; B C Kahan; R F A Logan; S A Hearnshaw; C J Doré; S P L Travis; M F Murphy; K R Palmer Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Alan N Barkun; Marc Bardou; Ernst J Kuipers; Joseph Sung; Richard H Hunt; Myriam Martel; Paul Sinclair Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Joseph J Y Sung; Kelvin K F Tsoi; Terry K W Ma; Man-Yee Yung; James Y W Lau; Philip W Y Chiu Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ki Tae Suk; Hyun-Soo Kim; Chang Seob Lee; Il Young Lee; Moon Young Kim; Jae Woo Kim; Soon Koo Baik; Sang Ok Kwon; Dong Ki Lee; Young Lim Ham Journal: Clin Endosc Date: 2011-12-31