Literature DB >> 23801840

Rockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Chang-Yuan Wang1, Jian Qin, Jing Wang, Chang-Yi Sun, Tao Cao, Dan-Dan Zhu.   

Abstract

AIM: To validate the clinical Rockall score in predicting outcomes (rebleeding, surgery and mortality) in elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken in 341 patients admitted to the emergency room and Intensive Care Unit of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The Rockall scores were calculated, and the association between clinical Rockall scores and patient outcomes (rebleeding, surgery and mortality) was assessed. Based on the Rockall scores, patients were divided into three risk categories: low risk ≤ 3, moderate risk 3-4, high risk ≥ 4, and the percentages of rebleeding/death/surgery in each risk category were compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated to assess the validity of the Rockall system in predicting rebleeding, surgery and mortality of patients with AUGIB.
RESULTS: A positive linear correlation between clinical Rockall scores and patient outcomes in terms of rebleeding, surgery and mortality was observed (r = 0.962, 0.955 and 0.946, respectively, P = 0.001). High clinical Rockall scores > 3 were associated with adverse outcomes (rebleeding, surgery and death). There was a significant correlation between high Rockall scores and the occurrence of rebleeding, surgery and mortality in the entire patient population (χ² = 49.29, 23.10 and 27.64, respectively, P = 0.001). For rebleeding, the area under the ROC curve was 0.788 (95%CI: 0.726-0.849, P = 0.001); For surgery, the area under the ROC curve was 0.752 (95%CI: 0.679-0.825, P = 0.001) and for mortality, the area under the ROC curve was 0.787 (95%CI: 0.716-0.859, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The Rockall score is clinically useful, rapid and accurate in predicting rebleeding, surgery and mortality outcomes in elderly patients with AUGIB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Elderly patients; Prognosis; Rockall score

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801840      PMCID: PMC3683686          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  40 in total

1.  [Prospective validation of the Rockall Scoring System in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Cayetano Heredia Hospital Lima- Peru].

Authors:  Jorge Espinoza Ríos; Jorge Huerta-Mercado Tenorio; Jorge Huerta-Mercado Tenorio; Mayra Lindo Ricce; Carlos García Encinas; Sathya Rios Matteucci; Sandro Vila Gutierrez; José Pinto Valdivia; Raúl De Los Rios Senmache; Alejandro Piscoya Rivera; Alejandro Bussalleu Rivera
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Peru       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun

2.  Causes and outcome of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: the Grady Hospital experience.

Authors:  C M Wilcox; W S Clark
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  The management of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a multiparametric computer analysis.

Authors:  H S Himal; W W Watson; C W Jones; L Miller; L D Maclean
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Bleeding peptic ulcer.

Authors:  L Laine; W L Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  E Wee
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.476

6.  Prospective validation of the Rockall risk scoring system for upper GI hemorrhage in subgroups of patients with varices and peptic ulcers.

Authors:  D S Sanders; M J Carter; R J Goodchap; S S Cross; D C Gleeson; A J Lobo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Characteristics and outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding after therapeutic endoscopy in the elderly.

Authors:  Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya; Nonthalee Pausawasdi; Nuttiya Laosanguaneak; Jakkrapan Bubthamala; Tawesak Tanwandee; Somchai Leelakusolvong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.043

9.  Causes of mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective cohort study of 10,428 cases.

Authors:  Joseph J Y Sung; Kelvin K F Tsoi; Terry K W Ma; Man-Yee Yung; James Y W Lau; Philip W Y Chiu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Etiology and prevalence of severe persistent upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  D Fleischer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay Chandnani; Pravin Rathi; Nikhil Sonthalia; Suhas Udgirkar; Shubham Jain; Qais Contractor; Samit Jain; Anupam Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05-24

2.  Multicenter evaluation of first-line endoscopic treatment with the OTSC in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and comparison with the Rockall cohort: the FLETRock study.

Authors:  E Wedi; A Fischer; J Hochberger; C Jung; S Orkut; H J Richter-Schrag
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Absence of Helicobacter pylori is not protective against peptic ulcer bleeding in elderly on offending agents: lessons from an exceptionally low prevalence population.

Authors:  Yeong Yeh Lee; Nordin Noridah; Syed Abdul Aziz Syed Hassan; Jayaram Menon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Blatchford Score Is Superior to AIMS65 Score in Predicting the Need for Clinical Interventions in Elderly Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed.

Authors:  Khalid Abusaada; Fnu Asad-Ur-Rahman; Vladimir Pech; Umair Majeed; Shengchuan Dai; Xiang Zhu; Sally A Litherland
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2016-08-28

5.  Use of over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) improves outcomes of high-risk adverse outcome (HR-AO) non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB).

Authors:  Ravishankar Asokkumar; Roy Soetikno; Andres Sanchez-Yague; Lim Kim Wei; Ennaliza Salazar; Jing Hieng Ngu
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-07-04

6.  Predictors of rebleeding and in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper digestive bleeding.

Authors:  Daniela Cornelia Lazăr; Sorin Ursoniu; Adrian Goldiş
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Prediction of in-hospital mortality after acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: cross-validation of several risk scoring systems.

Authors:  Daniela Benedeto-Stojanov; Milica Bjelaković; Dragan Stojanov; Boris Aleksovski
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 8.  Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding; a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Hanieh Ebrahimi Bakhtavar; Hamid Reza Morteza Bagi; Farzad Rahmani; Kavous Shahsavari Nia; Arezu Ettehadi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01-11

9.  Profile and outcome of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding presenting to urban emergency departments of tertiary hospitals in Tanzania.

Authors:  Shaffin S Rajan; Hendry R Sawe; Asha J Iyullu; Dereck A Kaale; Nancy A Olambo; Juma A Mfinanga; Ellen J Weber
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.067

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.