Literature DB >> 19752168

Irregular surface compensation for radiotherapy of the breast: correlating depth of the compensation surface with breast size and resultant dose distribution.

D J Emmens1, H V James.   

Abstract

Irregular surface compensation uses dynamic multileaf collimators to modify the fluence to an irregular surface along the cranio-caudal axis. The depth of the compensation surface can be varied by specifying a user-defined parameter called the transmission penetration depth (TPD). In our institution, a review has been carried out of 60 breast patients treated using irregular surface compensation of the tangent fields. The effect of changes in the TPD on the dose distribution was investigated, and the optimum TPD was correlated with the maximum field separation (S(max)) along the posterior border. Reducing the TPD below 50% pushes the dose towards the front of the breast. This reduces hot spots at the medial and lateral regions next to the posterior border of the tangential fields, particularly for patients with large separation. In 23/60 patients, with a mean S(max) of 23.9 +/- 1.6 cm, a TPD between 35% and 45% was used to reduce the proportion of the planning target volume receiving more than 107% of the prescribed dose by 3.4% +/- 2.8%. Our department protocol states that, subject to an acceptable dose distribution, a TPD of 40% is used if S(max) is greater than 24 cm; for smaller separations, a TPD of 50% is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19752168      PMCID: PMC3473527          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/65264916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  20 in total

1.  The delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy to the breast using multiple static fields.

Authors:  P M Evans; E M Donovan; M Partridge; P J Childs; D J Convery; S Eagle; V N Hansen; B L Suter; J R Yarnold
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  A simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy technique for the breast.

Authors:  Chen-Shou Chui; Linda Hong; Margie Hunt; Beryl McCormick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Intensity modulation for breast treatment using static multi-leaf collimators.

Authors:  Y C Lo; G Yasuda; T J Fitzgerald; M M Urie
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation.

Authors:  Tom Depuydt; Ann Van Esch; Dominique Pierre Huyskens
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  A dosimetric comparison of electronic compensation, conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy, and tomotherapy in patients with early-stage carcinoma of the left breast.

Authors:  Jimmy J Caudell; Jennifer F De Los Santos; Kimberly S Keene; John B Fiveash; Wenquan Wang; Janice D Carlisle; Richard Popple
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  An improved breast irradiation technique using three-dimensional geometrical information and intensity modulation.

Authors:  B van Asselen; C P Raaijmakers; P Hofman; J J Lagendijk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Optimizing breast cancer treatment efficacy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Frank A Vicini; Michael Sharpe; Larry Kestin; Alvaro Martinez; Christina K Mitchell; Michelle F Wallace; Richard Matter; John Wong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Dosimetric improvements following 3D planning of tangential breast irradiation.

Authors:  A Aref; D Thornton; E Youssef; T He; S Tekyi-Mensah; L Denton; G Ezzell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  L L Kestin; M B Sharpe; R C Frazier; F A Vicini; D Yan; R C Matter; A A Martinez; J W Wong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Practical experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  H V James; C D Scrase; A J Poynter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of semiautomated tangential VMAT with 3DCRT for breast or chest wall and regional nodes.

Authors:  Mikel Byrne; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Yunfei Hu; Andrew Fong; Leena Chong; Amy Teh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Semi-supervised planning method for breast electronic tissue compensation treatments based on breast radius and separation.

Authors:  Alexander R Podgorsak; Lalith K Kumaraswamy
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Dosimetric evaluation of irregular surface compensator and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gokcen Inan; Osman Vefa Gul; Hamit Basaran
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-12-30

4.  Improvement of dose distribution with irregular surface compensator in whole breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Fujita Hideki; Kuwahata Nao; Hattori Hiroyuki; Kinoshita Hiroshi; Fukuda Haruyuki
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-07

5.  Predictive parameters for selection of electronic tissue compensation radiotherapy in early-stage breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Yanbo Song; Miao Zhang; Lu Gan; Xiaopin Chen; Tao Zhang; Ning J Yue; Sharad Goyal; Bruce Haffty; Guosheng Ren
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-31

6.  Dosimetric Comparison of Irregular Surface Compensator and Field-in-Field for Whole Breast Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nao Kuwahata; Hideki Fujita; Hideaki Yamanishi; Eiichiro Okazaki; Haruyuki Fukuda
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.