Literature DB >> 17674981

A dosimetric comparison of electronic compensation, conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy, and tomotherapy in patients with early-stage carcinoma of the left breast.

Jimmy J Caudell1, Jennifer F De Los Santos, Kimberly S Keene, John B Fiveash, Wenquan Wang, Janice D Carlisle, Richard Popple.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been shown to significantly reduce dose to normal tissue while maintaining coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV) in patients with intact breast cancer. We compared delivery of whole breast irradiation utilizing three techniques: electronic tissue compensation (ECOMP), inverse-planned dynamic multileaf collimation IMRT (DMLC), and tomotherapy (TOMO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with early stage, left-sided breast cancer were selected for planning. CTV was defined as breast encompassed in a standard tangent field minus the superficial 5 mm from the skin edge. Normal tissue contours included the heart, lungs, and contralateral breast. Plans included delivery of 45 Gy in 25 fractions and were normalized to ensure > or =95% coverage of the CTV. Isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms for CTV and normal tissue were compared between plans. The time it took to plan each patient excluding contouring, as well as number of monitor units (MUs) required to execute each plan were additionally tabulated.
RESULTS: The TOMO plans resulted in significantly greater heterogeneity (CTV V(115)) versus ECOMP (p = 0.0029). The ECOMP plans resulted in significantly lower doses to heart, lung, and contralateral breast when compared with TOMO plans. The ECOMP plans were generated in the shortest time (12 min) and resulted in the lowest number of MUs when compared with DMLC (p = 0.002, p < 0.0001) and TOMO (p = 0.0015, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The ECOMP plans produced superior dose distributions in both the CTV and normal tissue when compared with TOMO or DMLC plans. In addition, ECOMP plans resulted in the lowest number of MUs and labor cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17674981     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  Intensity-modulated adjuvant whole breast radiation delivered with static angle tomotherapy (TomoDirect): a prospective case series.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Franco; Michele Zeverino; Fernanda Migliaccio; Piera Sciacero; Domenico Cante; Valeria Casanova Borca; Paolo Torielli; Cecilia Arrichiello; Giuseppe Girelli; Gianmauro Numico; Maria Rosa La Porta; Santi Tofani; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Irregular surface compensation for radiotherapy of the breast: correlating depth of the compensation surface with breast size and resultant dose distribution.

Authors:  D J Emmens; H V James
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Breast cancer and funnel chest. Comparing helical tomotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with regard to the shape of pectus excavatum.

Authors:  M Uhl; F Sterzing; G Habl; K Schubert; H Holger; J Debus; K Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Use of helical tomotherapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer for locoregional treatment.

Authors:  Laura Thery; Alexandre Arsene-Henry; Susan Carroll; Dominique Peurien; Louis Bazire; Magalie Robilliard; Alain Fourquet; Youlia M Kirova
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Short course radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for stage I-II breast cancer, early toxicities of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hilde Van Parijs; Geertje Miedema; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Sylvia Verbanck; Nele Adriaenssens; Dirk Kerkhove; Truus Reynders; Daniel Schuermans; Katrien Leysen; Shane Hanon; Guy Van Camp; Walter Vincken; Guy Storme; Dirk Verellen; Mark De Ridder
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment modalities for total scalp irradiation: the conventional lateral photon-electron technique, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jin Ho Song; Ji-Young Jung; Hyung-Wook Park; Gi Woong Lee; Soo-Min Chae; Chul Seung Kay; Seok Hyun Son
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Dosimetric comparison for volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy on the left-sided chest wall and internal mammary nodes irradiation in treating post-mastectomy breast cancer.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Xiao Li Yu; Wei Gang Hu; Jia Yi Chen; Jia Zhou Wang; Jin Song Ye; Xiao Mao Guo
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and conventional Linac-based X-knife stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary lung cancer or pulmonary metastases.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Li; Ju Yang; Juan Liu; Shanbao Gao; Baorui Liu; Jing Yan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  A comparative dosimetric study for treating left-sided breast cancer for small breast size using five different radiotherapy techniques: conventional tangential field, filed-in-filed, tangential-IMRT, multi-beam IMRT and VMAT.

Authors:  Guang-Hua Jin; Li-Xin Chen; Xiao-Wu Deng; Xiao-Wei Liu; Ying Huang; Xiao-Bo Huang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Improvement of dose distribution with irregular surface compensator in whole breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Fujita Hideki; Kuwahata Nao; Hattori Hiroyuki; Kinoshita Hiroshi; Fukuda Haruyuki
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.