Literature DB >> 19747041

Diagnosis and management of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy residual stone fragments.

Andreas Skolarikos1, Athanasios G Papatsoris.   

Abstract

Residual stone fragments can occur in up to 8% of patients who are treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). When left untreated, approximately half of these patients will experience a stone-related event, for which more than half will need a secondary surgical intervention. Predictors of adverse events are a residual fragment larger than 2 mm that is located in the pelvis or ureter. Preventive measures for the creation of residual fragments include a carefully selected access giving exposure to the bulk of the stone, the creation of multiple tracts, the use of single pulse pneumatic lithotripsy, the prevention of stone migration with ureteral balloons or stone cones, and careful flushing of the stones from the collecting system. Plain radiography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder, linear tomography, and ultrasonography have all been used to judge the result of PCNL and to detect the presence of residual fragments. Thin-slice, unenhanced helical CT, however, is more sensitive and should be performed at 1 month after surgery. While medical therapy and shockwave lithotripsy possess a minor role, second-look flexible nephroscopy and/or flexible ureterorenoscopy seem to be the treatments of choice for residual stone fragments after PCNL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19747041     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.1546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  21 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: Which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes?

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kidney stones >2 cm: a bicentric prospective assessment.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Miernik; Martin Schoenthaler; Konrad Wilhelm; Ulrich Wetterauer; Marcin Zyczkowski; Andrzej Paradysz; Piotr Bryniarski
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Stone scattering during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of renal anatomical characteristics.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Ali Eslahi; Ali Reza Safarpour; Sasan Mehrabi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric age group: Assessment of effectiveness and complications.

Authors:  Ender Ozden; Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-06

Review 6.  Focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones: review and update of preclinical technology.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey; Ryan S Hsi; Bryan W Cunitz; Julianna C Simon; Yak-Nam Wang; Barbrina L Dunmire; Marla Paun; Frank Starr; Wei Lu; Andrew P Evan; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  The current role of percutaneous chemolysis in the management of urolithiasis: review and results.

Authors:  Stefanos Kachrilas; Athanasios Papatsoris; Christian Bach; Andreas Bourdoumis; Faruquz Zaman; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Methylene Blue Injection as an Alternative to Antegrade Nephrostography to Assess Urinary Obstruction After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Matthew D Truesdale; Molly Elmer-Dewitt; Marco Sandri; Bogdana Schmidt; Ian Metzler; Adam Gadzinski; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Philip M Blomgren; Ryan S Hsi; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Marla Paun; Frank Starr; Bryan W Cunitz; Michael R Bailey; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Kaan Ozdedeli; Mete Cek
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.