Literature DB >> 25207006

Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Kaan Ozdedeli1, Mete Cek1.   

Abstract

Clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRFs) are described as asymptomatic, noninfectious and nonobstructive stone fragments (≤4 mm) remaining in the urinary system after the last session of any intervention (ESWL, URS or PCNL) for urinary stones. Their insignificance is questionable since CIRFs could eventually become significant, as their presence may result in recurrent stone growth and they may cause pain and infection due to urinary obstruction. They may become the source of persistent infections and a significant portion of the patients will have a stone-related event, requiring auxilliary interventions. CT seems to be the ultimate choice of assessment. Although there is no concensus about the timing, recent data suggests that it may be performed one month after the procedure. However, imaging can be done in the immediate postoperative period, if there are no tubes blurring the assessment. There is some evidence indicating that selective medical therapy may have an impact on decreasing stone formation rates. Retrograde intrarenal surgery, with its minimally invasive nature, seems to be the best way to deal with residual fragments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nephrolithotomy; percutaneous; urinary stones

Year:  2012        PMID: 25207006      PMCID: PMC4115827          DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Balkan Med J        ISSN: 2146-3123            Impact factor:   2.021


  44 in total

1.  New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Francis Dubosq; Karim Jamali; Bernard Gattegno; Philippe Thibault
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large complete staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Monish Aron; Rajiv Yadav; Rajiv Goel; Surendra B Kolla; Gagan Gautam; Ashok K Hemal; Narmada P Gupta
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Renal tract calculi: comparison of stone size on plain radiography and noncontrast spiral CT scan.

Authors:  Philip Dundee; David Bouchier-Hayes; Hodo Haxhimolla; Richard Dowling; Anthony Costello
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access.

Authors:  Gaspar Ibarluzea; Cesare M Scoffone; Cecilia M Cracco; Massimiliano Poggio; Francesco Porpiglia; Carlo Terrone; Ander Astobieta; Isabel Camargo; Mikel Gamarra; Augusto Tempia; Josè G Valdivia Uria; Roberto Mario Scarpa
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Comparison of outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn calculi in those with single and multiple accesses.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Erhan Sari; Murat Binbay; Emrah Yuruk; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Mehmet Kaba; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Nephrolithiasis: what surgeons need to know.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Joseph W McQuaid; Elias Hyams; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.

Authors:  J D Denstedt; R V Clayman; D D Picus
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Treatment of staghorn calculi by percutaneous nephrolithotomy and SWL: the Hotel Dieu de France experience.

Authors:  S Merhej; M Jabbour; E Samaha; E Chalouhi; M Moukarzel; R Khour; R Chaiban
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Bumsik Hong; Taehan Park; Hyung Keun Park
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Confident intraoperative decision making during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does this patient need a second look?

Authors:  Andrew J Portis; Mark A Laliberte; Cindy Holtz; Wenjun Ma; Michael S Rosenberg; Carl A Bretzke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  3 in total

1.  Immediate versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for inaccessible stones after uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Esam A E Desoky; Amr M Fawzi; Ahmed Sakr; Ahmed Eliwa; Ehab R El Sayed; Diab El Sayed; Asharf M S Shahin; Emad A Salem; Hussien M Kamel; Waleed Shabana; Mostafa Kamel
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-12-28

2.  Lateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A safe and effective surgical approach.

Authors:  Jonathan Jian Wei Gan; Jaslyn Ju Lia Gan; Jasmine Ju Hsien Gan; Kim Tiong Lee
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

3.  Stone Clearance by Computed Tomography after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Chitaranjan Shah; Robin Bahadur Basnet; Arvind Shah; Prakash Chhettri; Anup Chapagain; Parash Mani Shrestha; Anil Shrestha
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 0.406

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.