Literature DB >> 26732844

Methylene Blue Injection as an Alternative to Antegrade Nephrostography to Assess Urinary Obstruction After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Matthew D Truesdale1, Molly Elmer-Dewitt1, Marco Sandri2, Bogdana Schmidt1, Ian Metzler1, Adam Gadzinski1, Marshall L Stoller1, Thomas Chi1.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains an effective treatment for large stones. When nephrostomy tube (NT) is left post operation, antegrade urine flow is often confirmed with antegrade nephrostography (ANG) before tube removal. We compare methylene blue (MB) test combined with NT capping trial against ANG to assess antegrade urine flow after PCNL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred one consecutive patients undergoing PCNL were prospectively enrolled between 7/2014 and 4/2015. An NT cap was placed the morning of postoperative day 1 (POD1). Failure was defined as need to uncap the NT for any reason. Two hours after capping, 7cc MB was injected into the NT. Positive MB test was defined as presence of blue per bladder Foley. ANG was then performed to assess antegrade urine flow. NTs were removed before discharge home when antegrade flow was documented. Primary outcomes included presence of antegrade flow on ANG and NT removal before discharge home. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and areas (Area under the ROC [AUC]), as well as Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), were calculated comparing agreement of capping trial, MB, and ANG with NT removal.
RESULTS: One hundred one subjects were included in this analysis. 52.9% were left-sided surgeries and 60.4% utilized lower pole punctures. On ROC areas evaluating tests for agreement with NT removal before discharge, MB AUC 0.71 (95% CI 0.60-0.83), capping trial AUC 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.75), combed capping trial and MB AUC 0.72 (95% CI 0.61-0.84), and ANG AUC 0.78 (95% CI 0.68-0.88). In predicting NT removal, ANG performed better than capping trial alone (p = 0.042), but no differences were seen between MB and ANG (p = 0.229), combining the capping trial with MB test and ANG (p = 0.266) or combined testing and MB alone (p = 0.972).
CONCLUSIONS: Combining capping trial with MB injection is similarly accurate for predicting NT removal after PCNL compared to ANG. Capping trial and MB may be used in combination to obviate the need for ANG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26732844      PMCID: PMC4939449          DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  25 in total

1.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

Review 2.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Is the routine check nephrostogram following percutaneous antegrade ureteric stent placement necessary?

Authors:  Keng Chuan Soh; Kiang Hiong Tay; Bien Soo Tan; Austin Mm Htoo; Richard Hg Lo; Shueh En Lin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: leave a tube!

Authors:  Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Diagnostic utility and clinical value of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy nephrostogram.

Authors:  Sero Andonian; Zhamshid Okhunov; Edan Y Shapiro; Arthur D Smith; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Novel integration of systems-based practice into internal medicine residency programs: the Interactive Cost-Awareness Resident Exercise (I-CARE).

Authors:  Robert L Fogerty; Jason J Heavner; John P Moriarty; Andre N Sofair; Grace Jenq
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography.

Authors:  Yasser Osman; Nasr El-Tabey; Hoda Refai; Ahmed Elnahas; Ahmed Shoma; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud Kenawy; Hamdy El-Kapany
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Bumsik Hong; Taehan Park; Hyung Keun Park
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Fate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Arvind Ganpule; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  1 in total

1.  Determinants of ureteral obstruction after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Harry H Lee; Heiko Yang; Patrick Martin-Tuite; Rei Unno; Fadl Hamouche; Justin Ahn; David Bayne; Marshall Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.861

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.