Literature DB >> 19746796

Variations of lung density and geometry on inhomogeneity correction algorithms: a Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation.

James C L Chow1, Michael K K Leung, Jake Van Dyk.   

Abstract

This work contributed the following new information to the study of inhomogeneity correction algorithm: (1) Evaluation of lung dose calculation methods as a function of lung relative electron density (rhoe,lung) and treatment geometry and (2) comparison of doses calculated using the collapsed cone convolution (CCC) and adaptive convolution (AC) in lung using the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation with the EGSnrc-based code. The variations of rhoe,lung and geometry such as the position and dimension of the lung were studied with different photon beam energies and field sizes. Three groups of inhomogeneous lung phantoms, namely, "slab," "column," and "cube," with different positions, volumes, and shapes of lung in water as well as clinical computed tomography lung images were used. The rhoe,lung in each group of phantoms vary from 0.05 to 0.7. 6 and 18 MV photon beams with small (4 x 4 cm2) and medium (10 x 10 cm2) field sizes produced by a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator were used. This study reveals that doses in the inhomogeneous lung calculated by the CCC match well with those by AC within +/- 1%, indicating that the AC, with an advantage of shorter computing times (three to four times shorter than CCC), is a good substitute for CCC. Comparing the CCC and AC to MC in general, significant dose deviations are found when the rhoe,lung is < or =0.3. The degree of deviation depends on the photon beam energy and field size and is relatively large when high-energy photon beams with small fields are used. For penumbra widths (20%-80%), the CCC and AC agree well with MC for the slab and cube phantoms with the lung volumes at the central beam axis (CAX). However, deviations (>2 mm) occur in the column phantoms, with two lung volumes separated by a unit density column along the CAX in the middle using the 18 MV beam with 4 x 4 cm2 field for rhoe,lung < or =0.1. This study provides new dosimetric data to evaluate the impact of the variations of rhoe,lung and geometry on dose calculations in inhomogeneous media using CCC and AC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19746796     DOI: 10.1118/1.3168966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Influence of respiration on dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of the lung.

Authors:  Rie Yamazaki; Rikiya Onimaru; Norio Katoh; Tetsuya Inoue; Takeshi Nishioka; Hiroki Shirato; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-03-19

2.  Commissioning and validation of fluence-based 3D VMAT dose reconstruction system using new transmission detector.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Takeshi Oono; Masato Maruyama; Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Yudai Kai; Yuya Nakamura
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-03-12

3.  Dose measurements in a thorax phantom at 3DCRT breast radiation therapy.

Authors:  Elsa Bifano Pimenta; Luciana Batista Nogueira; Tarcísio Passos Ribeiro de Campos
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-04-14

4.  Dosimetric accuracy of tomotherapy dose calculation in thorax lesions.

Authors:  Veronica Ardu; Sara Broggi; Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo; Paola Mangili; Riccardo Calandrino
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Runqing Jiang; Michael K K Leung
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Validation of fluence-based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Takeshi Ono; Masato Maruyama; Nozomu Nagasue; Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Yudai Kai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations - Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams.

Authors:  Jennifer B Smilowitz; Indra J Das; Vladimir Feygelman; Benedick A Fraass; Stephen F Kry; Ingrid R Marshall; Dimitris N Mihailidis; Zoubir Ouhib; Timothy Ritter; Michael G Snyder; Lynne Fairobent
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  The Effect of Algorithms on Dose Distribution in Inhomogeneous Phantom: Monaco Treatment Planning System versus Monte Carlo Simulation.

Authors:  Taylan Tuğrul
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-07

9.  A multi-institutional study for tolerance and action levels of IMRT dose quality assurance measurements in Korea.

Authors:  Jung-in Kim; Jin-Beom Chung; Yang-Kyun Park; Ju-Young Song; Sung Kyu Kim; Sung Hwan Ahn; Chang Heon Choi; Won Hoon Choi; Byungchul Cho; Sang Gyu Ju; Sung Jin Kim; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Dosimetry of small bone joint calculated by the analytical anisotropic algorithm: a Monte Carlo evaluation using the EGSnrc.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Runqing Jiang; Amir M Owrangi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.